this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2026
68 points (98.6% liked)
Videos
18520 readers
203 users here now
For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!
Rules
- Videos only (aside from meta posts flagged with [META])
- Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
- Don't be a jerk
- No advertising
- No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
- Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
- Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
- Duplicate posts may be removed
- AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^
Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
While i agree that engineers aren't getting dumber, many designs are increasingly stupid.
Over-engineering is a real problem.
My fucking car fuel door doesnt need to be motorized with a bunch if linkages and cables.
It's not over engineering. It's planned obsolescence. 2000-2005, German automakers took on a whole new business plan. No longer selling lifetime aspirational cars, switching to rented cars (or what douches call leasing) with a short second life, then to the junkyard. They built a business around the US culture of fake it until you make it and deep consumer debt. Today, we all know people driving $100k cars are still living paycheck to paycheck.
This was accomplished with engine plastics of known heat cycle durability, then "luxury" pricing that meant justifying prices with pointless gadgetry highlighted by auto "reviewers", who are not allowed to talk about long term reliability. Then along came Musk, with cars that are cheaper to make than ICE, so again, make them into rolling Best buys because American consumers love anything with a touch screen. Tesla then had the largest profit margins in the industry, while any of those gadgets or motorized switches could brick a car.
Of course, the plan only augmented and wasn't sustainable, as their cars now barely last until the lease is up.
You're right that planned obsolescence is real, i don't think all of it is planned obsolescence.
Some of them are genuinely engineering solutions to problems and/or improved efficiency, but i, and many others, would rather have the simplicity and reliability.
I would argue they're intentionally getting more likely to break. Or at least that is no longer a concern. It's straight up a benefit to some companies.
Yes, absolutely. I was considering other than purposeful enshittification, but we know that's happening, as well.
They are definitely designing motors to last 100,000 miles and then fail, with small turbo motors.