Not The Onion

21992 readers

998 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

‘Zara death pants’: are these the world’s most dangerous trousers? (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 5 days ago by kamenlady@lemmy.world to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

51 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 43 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Wide-legged and flowing, they are causing a storm on social media, with people posting videos of the fabric getting caught in escalators and causing painful trips.

Have skirts not been a thing before?

[–] Afaithfulnihilist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Some people's parents didn't teach them to fear and respect the escalator.

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

I hope her pants get caught and a bloodbath ensues!

[–] waterSticksToMyBalls@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

This a symptom of a society who didnt see LiveLeak escalator accidents growing up

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Usually people don't drag their skirt on the ground like the cuffs of those pants. It's a stupid design, the way to make them work is to model them after Japanese Hakama pants, but use lighter material.

[–] DarkSirrush@piefed.ca 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Uh, you are aware that until recently, skirts actually had a hem, a removable/replaceable section of cloth at the bottom, specifically meant to touch the ground so a woman's feet weren't visible, right?

There are also entire cultural/religious outfits that to this day still touch the ground that are worn daily.

Just because its not a common sight where you are doesn't mean it isn't a thing any were else.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Until recently, when escalators became more of a thing, because it's a stupid fucking design to be dragging your clothes on the ground.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

There are also entire cultural/religious outfits that to this day still touch the ground that are worn daily.

No, there are still clothing designs that incorporate hems that touch the ground.

[–] blartcap_@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So what exactly is happening when people wear these danger-pants? Apparently the voluminous fabric gets wrapped around itself, as well as the wearer’s ankles and feet, causing them to trip.

Surely that’s always going to be an issue with this kind of very baggy design? That’s what stylist Clare Chambers told the Metro. “The wider the leg, the more likely it is to get caught and wrapped around the opposite leg/foot causing the wearer to trip and fall,” she said.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago

...get caught and wrapped around the opposite leg/foot...

I see. The tripping issue comes from the interior leg fabric. That makes a little more sense.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not sure but usually a skirt does not touch the floor.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Back in the day they did though, when it was fashionable

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 2 points 5 days ago

Yess death to the flowy extra baggy ridiculous trash bag pants.