this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
76 points (97.5% liked)

Slop.

874 readers
357 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The term Tankie has a clear definition that Cowbee likes to ignore:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankie Tankie is a pejorative label generally applied to authoritarian communists, especially those > who support or defend acts of repression by such regimes, their allies, or deny the > occurrence of the events thereof.

Join the lemmy.ml boycott today and help foster a better Lemmy-verse! No more posts, comments (except to counter their propaganda ofc!) or upvotes on any comms on the > Lemmy.ml instance! To make this easy you can do an instance block at Settings > Block Tab > Scroll to bottom > Input "lemmy.ml" and apply

And consider donating to individual instances instead.

Check the megathread for more!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] axont@hexbear.net 32 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Liberals believe in a hypothetical good communist that would not qualify as a tankie. This imaginary communist was cooked up by liberals out of first principles for how they believe a communist should act and behave, because the core instinct of the liberal is to accuse their enemies of being secret right-wingers who are lying about their intentions. The hypothetical good communist would have ideals that we would say are similar to an ultra-leftist, or the completely fictional "patriotic communist" thing. As in:

  • rejection of association with any current socialist state
  • rejection of militant organizing
  • rejection of any intermediary stage in the progression towards communism. Immediately abolish the commodity form
  • complete agreement with the western world order

So under their metric for a non-tankie leftist, Che Guevara would be a bad communist because he seized state power and used violent means. Whereas a good communist would be someone like Vaush, an internet streamer who advocates for the election of Democrats to public office.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 21 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Right and Vaush is just Destiny dressed up in red and black. Not a leftist but a liberal claiming to be a leftist but everything they advocate people do is just liberalism.

Their non-tankie is just a liberal pretending to be a communist. Every communist that actually poses any argument to liberals and opposes action that reinforces liberalism is a tankie.

Therefore every communist is a tankie. Therefore tankie just means, communist.

That's not even getting into the fact that the very definition itself applies to all communists. Let's go through each group:

MLs: Support all AES. Tankies

Trots: Support Cuba. Authoritarian state. Tankies

Maoists: Don't support China. Support USSR. Tankies.

DemSocs: Support Cuba. Some support USSR (jeremy corbyn and all Euro DemSocs for example). Tankies

This effectively amounts to 95% of all people that call themselves communists. Going into increasingly more niche sects of communist is pointless.

[–] agentant@hexbear.net 25 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They're hypothetical non-tankie communist is Bernie Sanders

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 15 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

So, a liberal...

screm-a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa