this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
50 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2268 readers
985 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

There we go again with the bothsidism bullshit

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah there is an element of that, but I don't think it's entirely controversial to say that it all gets old very quickly.

Critical thinking takes work and research, which is fine for a specific topic or when you're reading something with existing context like something historic... but keeping on top of something where all the belligerents are pushing out narrative on a daily basis becomes fucking soul-destroying to fact-check and evaluate.

I don't think this is a "both sides" fallacy. It's just being super fed up of the constant shitslinging and media manipulation.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

It is alwqys a bothside fallacy when you you equate the agressed and aggresor

[–] usernameunnecessary@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I was merely talking about trustworthiness, not about anything else. But you are right, there is no comparison of the levels of untrustworthiness of the two aggressors in the sentence, with the defending country. Iran has their own share of issues but there's no doubt as to who the bullies are in this specific case.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

With the rhetoric of none are untrustworthy. It easy to blame both for the lack of solution which is a problem