this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
130 points (96.4% liked)

World News

56987 readers
1634 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Mate, you’ve shown time and time again that you don’t understand what is said.

Don’t quote it. Read it.

So you finally answered my initial question, amazing.

Ahhhh, so you were… how you say it… “just asking questions”?

And how many questions of mine have you not answered. My question to you was the answer dumbass. You could have figured it out for yourself. The sanctions were intended to drain the economy so much that Russia couldn’t continue fighting

And yes, she was wrong, as they were at their third sanction package at the time of that statement. They needed 17 (!) more to add on top of those. So no, those three packages in 2022 were not in fact draining the economy.

Also, what you don’t get is the simple fact it was just one example. I’ve shown you a whole bunch more after that which you tried and failed to pick apart.

So yeah, I think you’re still very much the dumbass here :)

Sorry, better go look for that pink flying elephant up there.

[–] Vergissmeinnicht@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Don’t quote it. Read it.

Sure, let's do that.

I’ll believe it when I see it. I have been hearing this since 2022 and they’re unleashing more and more ballistic missiles on Kyiv every week

I’ll believe it when I see it.

no mention of the word "headline"

I have been hearing this since 2022

no mention of the word "headline"

and they’re unleashing more and more ballistic missiles on Kyiv every week

no mention of the word "headline"

I said I will believe it when I see it, since I have seen people say things like the headline of this article for years

huh

And how many questions of mine have you not answered.

yeah, not engaging in your gish gallop

My question to you was the answer dumbass

no

The sanctions were intended to drain the economy so much that Russia couldn’t continue fighting

no, and that's not what Von der Leyen said either.

That's your wishful thinking based on incorrect understanding. Again, don't blame others for your illiteracy.

There was discussion back in 2022 about what can and can't be achieved with sanctions. And it was constantly reiterated that it would take years to have major economic impacts as Russia wears out industrial machinery beyond its useful lifetime, and burns through its substantial monetary reserves. The only short term hope was that the Russian elite would have more power and force Putin's hand to protect their wealth.

So if you were one of the idiots who didn't listen back then that it would take years, and then misinterpreted every clickbait headline as a factual statement about the immediate collapse of the Russian economy that's on you. Maybe stick to simpler topics.

[–] Vergissmeinnicht@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Ahhhh, so you were… how you say it… “just asking questions”?

Since you're still on about this, yes, I admit I was wrong about this.

I assumed you were informed on the subject matter and were "just asking questions" to push an agenda.

But turns out you were trying to employ the Socratic method. Which requires a deep understanding of the subject matter, which of course you lack. You're just an idiot who doesn't understand how economies work and who takes clickbait headlines as fact.

Me accusing you of "just asking questions" was giving you orders of magnitude more credit than you deserve.

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You’re still wrong.

I am informed. You are not. That was immediately obvious due to your dumb question, which is why I started probing you.

And nice “no u”. But you keep forgetting you haven’t made a single valid point in this entire discussion.

You can’t admit it and you’re just too arrogant for your own intelligence. Donald fucking Trump would have made a better discussion partner. I have become dumber with every comment you’ve made.

[–] Vergissmeinnicht@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I am informed.

reading clickbait headlines isn't being informed.

But you keep forgetting you haven’t made a single valid point in this entire discussion.

You wouldn't notice one of it hit you in the face. Except maybe if it came with a clickbait headline.