this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
349 points (97.3% liked)

PC Gaming

14985 readers
1095 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Crazy people are trying to drown out your comments with down votes when you are just stating facts.

The stream machine is unfortunately a failure for the price. It should have been 600ish tops for the hardware. You can get a much better system for similar or slightly more which makes it's price to perf horrible.

Yes I know it's because of datacenter and price fixing but it doesn't make the steam machine a good system compared to others

[–] shaztopher@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You maybe could have gotten a much better system for a similar price a year or two ago but I’m not sure you could at today’s prices. Especially if you price out a small form factor one. I wouldn’t be surprised if the original price of steam machine was in the 6-700 range before the current ram/storage/gpu crisis

[–] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You can get a sff machine with a dedicated gpu and better processor though

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GLDVNNFG

One example that has a much better processor and gpu and smaller form factor too. Plus you can upgrade it so its not a giant paper weight.

https://www.microcenter.com/product/708800/G533_Gaming_PC;_AMD_Ryzen_5_7500X3D_40GHz_Processor;_AMD_Radeon_RX_9060_XT_16GB_GDDR6;_16GB_DDR5-6000_RAM;_1TB_Solid_State_Drive;_Microsoft_Windows_11

Way better but limited to microcenter.

Many DIY options too

https://www.pcmag.com/news/i-configured-four-small-pcs-to-beat-the-steam-machine-at-its-own-game

[–] shaztopher@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Those first 2 you posted are roughly 10x the volume of the steam machine, which is one of the big draws for me

16.6" x 10.2" x 14.4" = 40 L

8.5" x 15.75" x 16.50” = 36L

vs

6.1 x 6.0 x 6.4 = 3.7 L

And even the DIY page the cheapest config they came up with is $920. I think Valve pretty much cannot sell their machine less than comparable PC, because if they did, people would just start buying them as general purpose small PCs, so they need to make at least a small profit on them, unlike the dedicated console makers who can take a loss on the machines since the only way to get software on them is through them

[–] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 46 minutes ago

Lol you used volume to compare the physical size differences to make it sound much bigger.

Enjoy your very expensive paperweight in a few years because it can barely run games now well, let alone future ones.

I posted some examples I found in a few minutes checking that will offer a massive performance improvement and not take up a lot of space. You can find others if you cared to look