this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
94 points (100.0% liked)

news

24824 readers
449 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like "in Minecraft") and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is reposted from a video AryJeayBackup posted. There are similar videos and images of the funeral procession on that account, plus on other pro-Iran accounts.


With the funeral of the late Khamenei drawing crowds of millions of Iranians, and many dozen visits from foreign delegations and high-up figures from around the world, the war itself has hit a temporary lull. It appears that the battle over whether the Omani route is legitimate is continuing, with transits sometimes relatively elevated (but still nowhere close to pre-war levels) due to American air support, and sometimes stopped by an Iranian strike. What's currently happening in the negotiations is extremely unclear to me because of a massive deluge of conflicting information and intentional disinformation.

However, with Vance confirming on live TV that they are treating the MoU as an opportunity to refill oil stocks (not physically possible to any significant degree given current transits and the SPR's current level) and that they'll see where they'll go from there, the US maintaining that Iran cannot be allowed to have a toll/service fee system, and of course the ethnic cleansing in Lebanon, I currently can't see how this ends without a return to war. The alternative, of course, is that either the US's or Iran's position is much precarious than they're letting on, and they are bluffing but will capitulate under serious fire. I've been keeping my mind as open to the latter possibility as I have the former, and of course, it's not as if Iran's economic situation is all sunshine and rainbows and so that could potentially be the deciding factor, but to me, militarily, Iran has never looked stronger. The missile cities truly stood the test, and its air defense network is still plenty powerful enough to deter American planes and drones from getting too close to its airspace.

Elsewhere, we are nearing the completion of the latest wave of comprador installation in Latin America, with Colombia and Peru returning to a hard right political stance after a brief stint with more left wing politics. Venezuela is also being forced into submission regardless of which party is technically in charge under threat of overwhelming force by the US, after the US successfully bypassed Venezuela's major and only defence, a well-armed and party-loyal population in the hundreds of thousands, by simply saying "If you take arms against us on the ground, we will do you what we did to Gaza." Whether the Venezuelan people will continue to accept this humiliation or rise up is still up to debate, but if there is no response by the government at all, it does seem to spell a pause, though not necessarily the end, of Chavismo as it is currently conceived, and new developments will be needed to take Venezuela forwards. And, finally, Cuba has been forced to take the Dengist route (reform and opening up) for the possibility of survival after nearly a century of a more tightly controlled socialist economy, as the siege this time around proved even more impactful than even the very difficult times after the fall of the USSR. The next logical steps for the US will be to crush Brazilian and Mexican leftist politics, so we may see the ignominious return of the Bolsonaro faction, and perhaps even the man himself.

As I currently see it, with electoral tampering and fraud now both very commonplace and essentially unpunishable by leftist forces, there's three main paths forward for the continent: 1) a return to the anti-imperialist guerrilla warfare that characterized much of the 20th century due to the once-again-confirmed failure of electoral politics; 2) just accepting submission to regional US hegemony as the US withdraws and relocates its forces and agents from Eurasia under fire, and hoping that maybe they can win an election here or there and that Somebody Abroad Does Something (the mythical "international community", etc); or 3) the allure of the growing Chinese hegemony proves too powerful for even the American compradors to resist and they sign developmentalist business deals with them that undercut the IMF and World's Bank plan to maintain imperialist underdevelopment.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on the Zionists' destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] a_party_german@hexbear.net 8 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

At this rate the Burger Reich might very well lose an aircraft carrier

As much as we like to joke about this - and as much as it's desirable for signaling the end of one of the worst empires in history - this would be a very difficult achievement for Iran to pull off.

Two challenges make this extremely hard and unlikely: First, you would have to find and fix the location of the carrier. While ships don't move super fast, a carrier with aircraft operations underway moves at 25-30 knots, i.e. ~50 kilometers per hour and more. That is quite fast, even when you fire a supersonic missile at it. The missile has to cover the 200-500 miles of distance to the target (I remember the US carriers operating up to 500 miles away during the Ramadan war, they didn't want to take risks of course), and in those ~10-20 minutes time the carrier has moved quite a bit, so your missile needs to have a good terminal guidance seeker, and it's not enough to fire it in the general vicinity of where you think it might be, so you would need powerful aerial radars or satellite recon to find the carrier group and know where to fire. Very few nations have this ability. Now Iran might get targeting data from those nations, or have a few satellites itself. Nobody knows how good those are, though.

Second, the carrier is protected by many other ships. Even assuming that it's just a few destroyers because the US Navy is in its worst shape in a century, they can pump out a lot of missile defense launches in a very short time, so you would have to do some kind of a saturation attack involving at least 10 supersonic anti-ship missiles, and ideally 20 or more. This would have to involve launch platforms that can be positioned close enough to the carrier, or very long-range missiles (remember those 500 miles!) Right now, probably only Russia and China are able to seriously attempt to do that. China has had anti-ship ballistic missiles for more than a decade now, I presume they work well enough. Russia has a plethora of anti-ship missiles and launch platforms, but even the mighty BrahMos has a range of just about 400-500 miles, so you would have to fire a volley right from the beach....and those are HUGE missiles, they have to be.

So yeah, not easy at all. We can see from the stories from Biden's crazy Red Sea adventures and the extreme distances that seemed to be involved in the Ramadan war that the US Navy is not taking this lightly, but it would be an extreme achievement for Iran.

[–] junebug2@hexbear.net 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

“Ships currently have no defense against a ballistic missile attack.” The article is from 2009, but truly not much has changed. Imperial naval modernization has been focused on radars and cruiser models that never get produced. China, and before them the Soviets, have had anti-ship ballistic missiles since the 1970s. Carriers being made obsolete wasn’t seen as a problem since a hot war between anyone with a big navy means nuclear apocalypse. Missiles from 20 years ago had 2000 km (~1250 mile) ranges and the ability to travel that distance in 12 minutes. Today, you can buy satellite navigation chips for cellphones for a few hundred dollars for the same effective quality as Cold War-era million dollar sensors. As the article says, every single advance in technology in the last fifty years has made the carrier more obsolete.

When the US sends boats to intercept missiles you have to remember that they are usually getting them at the top of the parabola. There were ships sitting by Cyprus shooting at targets over Iraq and Syria on trajectories toward occupied Palestine during the 10 Day War. Missiles coming at you are a different story, chiefly because none of the Phalanx missile defense systems are aimed straight up. Carriers have a two SAM launchers with a few dozen missiles (on the sides of the boat), and Arleigh Burkes have about 90 VLS cells. These can launch SM interceptor missiles. Sounds like a lot of air defense, but it’s actually the same tubes used to launch Tomahawks. If the US wants to strike Iran, they can’t bring 200 air defense missiles with their carriers. i agree that it would be lucky for Iran to create the Great Carrier Reef, but it’s definitely technically feasible.

[–] a_party_german@hexbear.net 1 points 1 hour ago

Yes, I thought of that article as I wrote the paragraph with the Chinese ASBMs. Prime war nerd...that was 17 years ago already? Damn.

Not not nitpick but

the Soviets, have had anti-ship ballistic missiles since the 1970s

is not correct I think. Ballistic missile active terminal guidance is super difficult since you have all these vaporized gases and whatnot messing with any seeker. I don't know how the PLA does it with their DF carrier killers, but the Soviet anti-shipping missiles were just regular very heavy supersonic missiles, I'd assume you're thinking P-700s, X-22 and the like. Those are quite different from a ballistic missile which is usually aimed at more stationary targets, but has a much higher range and speed. Regarding the VLS loadout, I'd assume they have at least 200 SM air-defense missiles for a carrier group. Tomahawks can be launched from subs just as well, and you have you regular air-launched cruise missiles, but the Aegis BM system is one of a kind. It would be extremely challenging to overcome that.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 4 points 5 hours ago

it's quite obvious that only tor🅱edo (or some deep underwater mine which can activate) can "easily" achieve this, and state of underwater communication is dire everywhere.