Platner says he's taking time to consider future of Maine Senate bid

Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Graham Platner speaks to voters at a town hall on June 7 in Portland, Maine. Photo: Laura Brett/Getty Images
Graham Platner, the Democratic nominee in Maine's Senate race, said he is "taking the time" to consider his next steps after a woman accused him of sexually assaulting her in 2021.
Why it matters: Platner, who denied the allegation, stopped short of saying he would end his campaign, but indicated he is weighing its future as he seeks to unseat Republican Sen. Susan Collins.
- Politico reported Monday that a woman who dated Platner says he forced her to have sex with him nearly five years ago despite her reported objections.
- "Regardless of the inaccuracy of the reporting, but mindful of the political reality it will inflict, we are taking the time to reflect on the best path forward for the state that I love, the people that I love, the movement I belong to, and the goal of defeating Susan Collins," Platner said in a video posted on X.
- "Those were the goals we launched this campaign with, and they remain my goals today."
"I wanted to directly address the troubling, serious, and false allegations against me. Any accusation of non-consensual behavior is categorically false," Platner said.
The big picture: Even before Monday's report, Democratic strategists and elected officials worried that Platner had too much baggage to defeat Collins
and that his candidacy would doom the party's chances of retaking the Senate in the 2026 midterms.
- Controversies that have swirled around his campaign include a Nazi-linked tattoo that he's since covered up, allegations that he sent sexual text messages to women outside of his marriage, and contentious social media posts.
- But the sexual assault allegation is the most serious.
Between the lines: At one point in Monday's video, Platner referred to his campaign in the past tense.
- "We were united in a focus on defeating Susan Collins."
Driving the news: Platner was responding to a story in Politico that included a detailed account of alleged sexual assault from a 41-year-old Maine woman, Jenny Racicot, who says she supports Platner's politics.
-
"I remember him grabbing my pelvis and being really forceful of me," Racicot told Politico. "I remember the specific moment where I thought to myself, like, 'This is no longer my choice.'"
-
Last month, Platner's campaign was shaken by a New York Times report examining his relationships with women, with a particular focus on his treatment of Lyndsey Fifield, whom he dated from 2019 to 2021.
-
The story included Fifield's firsthand account alleging that Platner once locked her in a bedroom. Fifield is a conservative activist.
Zoom out: Platner weathered the controversy and went on to win Maine's Democratic Senate primary days later.
- Racicot also spoke with The New York Times before it published the story but did not go on the record about her sexual assault allegation at the time.
She said she decided to come forward after reading the Times story and seeing how both her experience and Fifield's were portrayed.
- "My part of the story was just a read-over," Racicot told Politico. "And the story was Lyndsey, and the accusations of her being politically motivated."
- "One of the reasons I didn't come forward sooner was the huge moral conflict I had between supporting his politics but not supporting him as a person," she said. "I just want the truth out there. I just want people to have the full picture of who he is as a person."
Editor's note: This story has been updated with additional comments from Platner and details about the sexual assault allegation.
Absolutely everyone could've seen this coming. If a dude is a nazi (former or not) with 4 tours and time in a merc unit, all of which he's still proud of, then he's done some absolutely fucking heinous shit. If he's done heinous shit abroad, he's done heinous shit at home too.
This won't be the end of it and that's why he's backing out, not because he's ashamed but because if he doesn't then he might end up in a court and he doesn't want that.
Absolutely anyone could've seen this coming but they still supported him. They're so fucking stupid. This needs to be the lesson people are slapped around the face with over this, they NEED to learn that these dudes that "reform" are not valid candidates.
What I'm still a little confused about is why he tried to run in the first place.
Platner knows he's done heinous shit, he was the one doing it. Did he think none of his victims would come forward? And he's folding now that it looks like they actually are coming forward?
Like, what was the miscalculation this murdering piece of shit made that allowed him to think his skeletons would stay happily buried if he ran for office?
As I think Racicot said in her recent interview, there are many monsters relying on the silence of the women they have victimized. There are all sorts of things we can point to to speculate on Platner's miscalculation, but I think fundamentally he probably just assumed that Racicot didn't want to talk about it, so he didn't need to worry.
Here is my speculation, though: by Racicot's own account, he was also apparently blackout drunk at the time and didn't remotely acknowledge the gravity of what he did the following day, so it's possible that he did some sort of mental gymnastics over the course of years to come to regard it as much less than what it really was. From a standpoint of imagined intellectual or personal integrity, there is no justifying him not understanding that what he did was catastrophically bad, but from a standpoint of continuously engaging in motivated reasoning on his own with no one to contradict him [aside from the one time Racicot messaged him after, where he at least saw the messages but never responded], I think it's possible that he functionally deluded himself about the matter in order to avoid feeling guilty over this particular horrible thing he did. This probably isn't unlike how he must have learned to justify to himself all the other horrible things he did as an imperialist dog, despite some commentators saying that him being proud of his "service" isn't a red flag.
That makes sense of it for me, thank you!
Maybe he saw what the DNC did for Biden and thought that would go that way for him even if he didn't play DNC ball on Israel? Idk lol
Sellouts are incentivized not to learn
have to believe in something first to sell it out