this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
70 points (92.7% liked)

politics

30572 readers
2035 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Is it really that hard to refrain from SAing someone? Or at bare minimum, not running for office if you have? The audacity of these candidates is mind-blowing.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Charismatic people are good at running for office and good at avoiding responsibility for things throughout their lives. We select for a trait that let's people get away with stuff.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's a perfect example of the type of rape culture we have in the US.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

When we take into account the fact that 1 in 4 women in the US have been sexually assaulted and 1 in every 6 women have been raped, then yes, it really appears to be hard to refrain from sexually assaulting people.

It would've been great if we hadn't rug swept this guy's past so hard.

[–] lemongarlic@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

I think the disturbing reality is just that rape and SA is much more common than people think it is

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's really really infuriating that it seems to be an almost universal law that if someone is running for office they are exactly the wrong kind of person and should never be allowed to hold office.

Douglas Adams puts it in a more humorous way:

The major problem—one of the major problems, for there are several—one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them.

To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it.

To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah it's frustrating as fuck.

At the same time, there were so many massive red flags. And I was excoriated here for mentioning them.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Is it really that hard to refrain from [sexually assaulting] someone?

Yes.

Is it easy to accuse someone? Yes. Does that mean the person did it? No. Does it mean they didn't? No.

[–] yuki_gassen@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

Here I thought not SAing was easy. Huh?