this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
107 points (99.1% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

69742 readers
215 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:

💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com
RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
unruffled@anarchist.nexus
107
When did we reach a point piracy has better service than paying? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 day ago by ButteredBread@sh.itjust.works to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
54 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

At least for media, piracy websites have a more extensive catalogue (of course) but they also have better privacy which is crazy. And they also allow you to use ad blockers. Sites you pay for would still show ads sometimes and don't even allow VPNs.

At that point there is no point on paying for streaming and if you wanted to support the creators you could do it separetely with merch, other proyects they have or direct donations if any of those are aviable.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

And most pirate streaming sites have a better player (and subtitle encoding of new episodes) than HBO Max.

Seriously, there's no fucking excuse for a multiple billion dollar conglomerate with some of the highest rated entertainment programs in history in their library to care THAT little about UX!

[–] Grostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

Audible is literally the biggest pile of dogshit, completely barebones, yet somehow still immensely battery hungry pile of trash (jk I know it's because of all the telemetry shit they're using to profile my habits) with next to none of the basic QoL features you'd find on various free apps that would make listening on their app a more enjoyable experience.

[–] Mondez 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Copyright gives them a monopoly over (legitimate) distribution so why spend any more than necessary when people can't go elsewhere for your content.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 23 hours ago

Because the legitimacy becomes less and less of a selling point the more you piss on your customers while other people are offering the same thing shown better for free