this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
202 points (95.5% liked)

News

38232 readers
2753 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

named after the evil all-seeing orb in the Lord of the Rings

Now, now. A point of order.

The Palantiri are not evil, at least not originally. They were made by the elf Feanor in the Undying Lands, and for the vast majority of Middle Earth's history, they were a tool for good, allowing the free people (especially Arnor and Gondor) to communicate with each other over long distances and monitor their kingdoms. However, with the fall of Arnor and the decline of Gondor, at least one of the Palantiri fell into the hands of Sauron, who used it for evil purposes. And this made all of the others dangerous to use as well, since using them would put one in direct communication with Sauron himself, potentially making one vulnerable to mind reading, psychic influence, or at least only being able to see things that Sauron wanted one to see. Only someone more powerful than Sauron could use them safely at that point, and there was no one left in Middle Earth at that time who was powerful enough to do so. (Aragorn was able to somewhat do it ... but he was only able to use it to directly communicate with Sauron -- even he wasn't able to fully control it and make it show whatever he wanted.)

It would be interesting to find out if Sauron's influence over the Palantiri was permanent, or if it ended after his downfall. But, unfortunately, as far as I know, the story never mentions how they were affected in the aftermath. Could go either way. With the destruction of the One Ring, everything Sauron built with his power was undone, which could include the corruption of the Palantiri. However, the Palantiri do seem to be susceptible to getting fixated on certain things if they're used for that purpose too much -- for example, even long before Sauron, one of them was already fixated so it could only be used to look into the Undying Lands, and only someone extremely powerful could make it show anything else. So it's possible that Sauron's long use of the Palantiri in general and especially the Palantir in his possession could have made all of them still permanently fixated on Mordor or something. It would have been nice to get some closure on that in the story, to find out if the Palantiri became useful again after Sauron's fall.


Of course, none of this applies to the actual US surveillance company, which definitely is evil.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

i heard he is obsessed with the fanfic version written bya russian, called the last ringbearer.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 1 points 45 minutes ago

Ah, of course he would be. The fanfic version where Sauron is a misunderstood hero.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Excellent write-up. I learned a lot! Always something new to learn about Middle Earth. :)

I recently watched a video essay that tried to explain why all these billionaires basically do the "invent the Torment Nexus from the famous novel Do Not Invent the Torment Nexus" thing...

Essentially, in their minds they're the hero. They have money and power and think they'll do it differently. Skynet without Judgement Day, Blade Runner's neon and flying cars without the social erosion, and so on...

It's so weird how Thiel is such a "fan" of Tolkien's works and yet his first move here was to double down on Boromir's initial folly:

Boromir: "Why not use this Ring? Long has my father, the Steward of Gondor, kept the forces of Mordor at bay. By the blood of our people are your lands kept safe! Give Gondor the weapon of the enemy. Let us use it against him!"

Aragorn: "You cannot wield it! None of us can. The One Ring answers to Sauron alone. It has no other master."

Imagine the hubris, thinking a global surveillance network with the power to designate its own targets would never be used by "the wrong hands." Pathetic.

[–] Weydemeyer@lemmy.ml 2 points 20 hours ago

I’m 100% sure that guys like Thiel and Musk have only, at most, watched the LotR movies but certainly have never read the books.

[–] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Technically correct, which is the best kind of correct. I have not read the books so I am just going by memory of the movie franchise which I haven't seen since it first came out (and I have Long Covid) so the finer points of The Lord of the Rings, The Hobbit, and The Silmarillion(Thank you spellcheck for that one) are not at my fingertips.

Considering the Death and Destruction of the real world Palantir, not to mention the evil use of general control and aid in creating a police state on purpose to the point that its employees have at several points have opened up large discussions that basically say "Are we the baddies???" I think the evil version of the Palantir shown in the films is the best analogue.

Anyway updating my post now.