this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
171 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

85964 readers
3764 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think it's about number of people I think it's about perceived sense of urgency on the part of various governments. A lot of people aren't very happy with AI but the threats are all existential at the moment. The moment something happens all the people who are already not happy with AI will suddenly have a threat to point to and then the governments around the world will have no choice but to act.

Although I suspect the Trump administration will still try and weedle out of regulating anything because they have so much business interest in the industry.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 5 hours ago

the threats are all existential at the moment.

I think you mean hypothetical. Possibly hypothetically existential.

The moment something happens all the people who are already not happy with AI will suddenly have a threat to point to

and hopefully, that something won't be an existential threat.