this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
837 points (97.8% liked)

Work Reform

16697 readers
561 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Lol.....man oh man that's quite the passive aggressive "you might be wrong cause you're fucked up"

You do realize that "feeling good" being altruistic is a selfish reason to do it. That is the benefit. Feeling good is a reward. You are literally describing doing something in order to get a positive reward which you then described as sociopathic. Just because the reward is "feeling good" doesn't make it any different. Are you a sociopath?

Obviously humans are a social species. The social part is only as functional as the social circle around it. You put a bunch of total strangers in an urgent life or death situation, do you really believe there will be any altrusim? Really? Come on now.......

We can absolutely be altruistic. The context is everything. What you would do with total strangers, high stakes and complete anonymity is what I'm talking about. Anything besides that and you have social factors influencing the picture, even if it's just about feeling good.

Edit: clarity

[โ€“] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago

If you exclude the essential social nature of a human from your scenario, and somehow anonymise them... Where exactly does this apply? I have been in a survival situation with strangers. We all just worked together to do the right thing, and make sure everyone was safe.

If your proposed essential human selfishness is so limited that it means they mostly do the right thing...