Europe

6657 readers

181 users here now

Europe

Rules:

All sources allowed. Voting decides what is reliable unless
Articles which have been proven false beyond any doubt may be removed
No personal attacks
Posts in English, translations allowed

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml

215

Womens rights (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 week ago by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/europe@lemmy.ml

203 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I know enough to want the killings to stop in Palestine, and again, nobody said anything about “…know nothing about the subject”. To me it’s not complicated. If you’re committing human rights violations, you’re in the wrong and you need to stop, because the ends do not justify the means.

Want something doesn't make it a reality, how you actually stop the genocide? By Two-state solution? Solidifying Hamas government? Expulsing Israel off the region? Do you condemn Hamas? You can only actually answer this with knowledge of history and culture which you think is secondary.

You said "well documented" ongoing violations of human rights in China, how can you validate the evidences of the "well documented" without the knowledge you seen to think is not necessary? Someone with knowledge in chinese language disproved the primary source, Adrian Zenz, by simply analyzing the numbers of IUD that Adrian provide versus the actual numbers, with a more significant knowledge about Chinese history and culture anyone would know that the usage of IUD in China is really common because of their policies about birth rates, minor changes in the number of IUD bought doesn't translate to "mass sterilization" which was one of the major violations of human rights in China.

Unless you have investigated a problem, you will be deprived of the right to speak on it. Isn't that too harsh? Not in the least. When you have not probed into a problem, into the present facts and its past history, and know nothing of its essentials, whatever you say about it will undoubtedly be nonsense.

You only know the present fact(debatable), think the past history is not necessary and know nothing of its essentials, so... shut the fuck up.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Want something doesn’t make it a reality, how you actually stop the genocide? By Two-state solution? Solidifying Hamas government? Expulsing Israel off the region? Do you condemn Hamas? You can only actually answer this with knowledge of history and culture which you think is secondary.

All of those things can be sorted out by experts once the killings stop. I'm not going to stop advocating for the end of the killings just because there isn't a document on how the long term solution should look, because that's not important right now.

You said “well documented” ongoing violations of human rights in China...

Yes. They're executing prisoners. That goes against Article 3. I don't need to know why they do it, how or when. I don't need to know Chinese. I don't need to know the history or the culture to criticize them for violating Article 3. Do you want to tell me that capital punishment isn't a thing in China?

You only know the present fact(debatable), think the past history is not necessary and know nothing of its essentials, so… shut the fuck up.

I don't need to know the history or culture of someone about to murder someone to want to stop them. This seems to be too hard for you to grasp, so I'm done with you and your insults now. Have a lovely day.