this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
854 points (98.7% liked)

memes

22215 readers
3088 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There was talk of embedding sensors in the roads that the auto-driving cars could track... Like Bots' Dots but with RFID tags in them... I figure that would be a maintenance nightmore though...

[–] pingveno@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

RFID tags seems like an odd choice. They have such a limited range. It feels like there would be a material that is extra easy for sensors to detect, and could maybe carry a small amount of information.

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 2 points 1 month ago

Probably, but really when it comes to driving there just needs to be an encoded lcoation in it... Hell three-words is all you need to mark any spot on the map to within 10'...

and what they really need is enough range to detect the last one, the closest one, and the next one...

There are a lot of ways to do it....Cameras and GPS are not it.. I won't go near any of the current incarnation of "Self Driving" pieces of shit... 40 years in IT and I know enough about computers that I don't want one making real decisions for me.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

It feels like there would be a material that is extra easy for sensors to detect, and could maybe carry a small amount of information.

Yes like an rfid tag for example

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

you could also maybe make the cars scan street signs to tell their current location? these street signs largely already exist as human drivers have to read them too.

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Character recognition takes a LOT more processing power than reading an RFID tag.

[–] Zunon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

hence the QR code suggestion, it also wouldn't depend on rfid tags embedded in the road surface that would get worn and damaged and needs replacement way more frequently than a sign with a QR code.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But cars already do that, for speed limit signs and such

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Not really. Most of the cars that display speed limits do it by retrieving data from an online source. I don't think any of them actually read signs actually.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A 5 sec google search: the ford fiesta manual says snow/rain covering the sensor under the windshield might make it miss signs.

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Interesting. Well that's terrifying. A little spray point and I can make an 85 mile an hour zone!

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

? The driver is in charge of driving, the assistant is just that

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 1 points 1 month ago

That's now how the owners of all of these 'full self driving' cars feel ..

I've worked with computers long enough to never EVER want to trust one to drive.

Pretty much fuck any car that's connected to the internet...