this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
298 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

86217 readers
2652 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mabeledo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I would argue that at least the Vision Pro offers something no other Apple product does.

The Steam Machine is a compact PC and its largest customer base are people who are invested in Steam, and thus they already own a PC.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's the form factor that's different here. Steam Machine is for the living room like a console, most people build a PC station and use it with a desk. Steam Machine is getting into the market of couch gaming and that's what they aim for with the form factor and the ease of use. There is market here, but the price is the one thing that failed.

[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly the steam mahcine isn't aiming for PC gamers, it is aiming for console players.

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or people like me. I used to own a PC. Life kept happening. I have a huge library. I'd like to dip back in.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I would also argue the Vision Pro was never expected to sell in volume or make a profit. It was always a test. If it established a market of content, it was a prototype and they win. If it was just a curiosity, the loss was budgeted and they never spent the money to scale up