Privacy

49339 readers

640 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

Help Me Understand The Proton Hate... (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 day ago by pyramidengine@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

71 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been a paid Proton Unlimited customer for several years now and aside from a few small complaints, I'm generally very happy with the services I'm paying for. I agree that there is too much focus on "sidequests" like Wallet and Meet before core products are fully rebuilt and meeting expectations. I agree that Linux versions and some feature implementations are taking a long time. However, I have a fully functioning suite of Mail, Drive, VPN, Calendar and more that meet 95% of my needs. To be fair, I'm sure the zero-access/zero-knowledge encryption aspect makes development much more difficult.

If you're worried about political affiliations/interests, I'll give you that Andy Yen has made a few worrisome comments. I'm not sure what to do there. Assuming there aren't repeat occurrences, I'm satisfied with their statement about the French political figure sponsorship.

If it's the FBI cases and subpoenas, it comes down to understanding the difference between privacy and anonymity, and knowing what strategy is required to achieve actual anonymity.

So why (especially on Lemmy) is there so much Proton hate/relunctancy? Eager to hear some non-biased, fact-driven thoughts here!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Mamdani didn't spout obviously false republican talking points on a public forum, and then double down in defense of the republican party when called out on it. The republicans don't support the little guy. Anyone that pays attention to anything the party has done since st least Reagan should know that. So what Mamdani did was not the equivalent, and it seems disengenuous to claim such an obviously false equivalency.

And I'm not saying divest from everyone that is wrong about anything. I'm saying that spreading obviously incorrect information that aligns with fascist talking points should be scrutinized. It should get called out. It should make people question your beliefs and motives.

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Just adding that Mamdani talks mad shit about Trump both before and after meeting with him. He's extremely principled in his approach.

[–] huey_m@reddthat.com -1 points 15 hours ago

Sure, but he was also perfectly willing to encourage him towards what he could frame as being a win for Trump, too.

I'm in no way saying Mamdani isn't principled. I'm saying he also has an eye for strategy over performative politics. There was, probably is, a small left cadre that was really giving him shit for meeting with Trump at all for fear of "legitimizing" or "normalizing" him... this strikes me as very, very similar to the dynamic around Yang.

Again, there has been ample opportunity for this guy to go to bat for fascism. Why only anti trust?

[–] huey_m@reddthat.com 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Again, you'll need to explain to me that if his real goal here is "align[ing] with fascist talking points", why is the only actual issue he jumped in on anti trust? Where was he regarding the election moves? Where was he regarding the ICE policies?

A decent anti trust pick isn't aligned at all with fascism, yet it's that issue that he spoke up on. Why only that when there have been countless issues that are aligned with fascism he could have commented on?

This screams the kind of now typical online left purity testing way more than fascism, to me.

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You quite obviously aren't willing to change your mind or consider other perspectives, so what did you even post this for? The whole discussion is just going round in circles.

[–] huey_m@reddthat.com 3 points 5 hours ago

? I mean, I'm replying?

I'm willing to hear the argument, I just haven't heard one yet aside from what I summarized above, which seems to me very weak. I think it's worth talking about because this line that keeps getting repeated by a small but vocal minority led me to believe that this guy was something like a JK Rowling that's pumping lots of money into groups that tangibly harm people, or is out there changing minds towards a very negative ideology or something... but he literally only took up the gauntlet regarding anti trust, which is pretty not-fascist.

I could ask the same... why participate if you aren't willing to consider maybe you were too hasty in judgment?