this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
278 points (91.4% liked)

Flippanarchy

2569 readers
353 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We have plenty of houses for the homeless. This is the worst part of the whole issue. We choose to keep people homeless even if there is plenty of housing. I believe there are 28 empty houses/homes for every homeless person.

Of course some people would argue that there isn't always enough empty houses in the area where homeless are. This is true, also some homeless people are so bad off they couldn't live in a house/apartment without some extra support. This is also true.

Regardless we can house most of the homeless but we actively choose not to. That is why I support housing first as the only proven way to tackle this issue.

https://nlihc.org/sites/default/files/Housing-First-Evidence.pdf

[–] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

Of course some people would argue that there isn’t always enough empty houses in the area where homeless are.

This is also because many places that have empty homes are really dangerous for and discriminatory against unhoused folks. So they are more likely to move to / survive in / stay at places where they have an easier time surviving because at least some shelter/social services exists, the locals aren't as murderous, the local cops aren't sweeping camps as often, things like giving food out for free isnt illegalized and because they can stay under the radar in the more anonymous big city.