If your only metric is "long dev cycles bad", then yeah this looks bad because you're comparing games stuck in development hell to a game that has demonstrably had like 8 years of real dev time. Additionally, it's not like Rockstar have put out stinkers in the past. every GTA game I've ever played has been a fun single player experience. I can't imagine R* nuking the billions they've spent developing their game and the goodwill they've gathered in the past. Are there going to be scammy bullshit things in the game? Sure. It's literally impossible for them to raise money from investors if they don't put it in there. But if it's another game "only" just as good as GTA v, it will sell incredibly well and be worth the up front money.

These comments that try to make Rockstar look or sound bad never work, lol. Comparing amazing single-player games like GTA V or RDR2 to Overwatch 2 or Star Fox? What? That is like pointing to different movie directors to try and argue why a talented popular one is going to fail. It's so goofy, lol. They are completely different teams of game developers with a track record of delivering.

The stuff you're missing out with GTA+ is incredibly meaningless. They are more cars and garages, who cares? You don't need them to enjoy 99.9% of the content Online, which are missions and heists you can do with your friends right now. You don't need the cosmetics. Same with Overwatch 2; that sequel was awesome, because the game became free for everyone to play, and right now they're being very generous with the amount of skins they give to Free Players; you can pretty much get 2-3 legendary skins every 2 months if you play for a few hours a week, no need to grind too hard. Those who hate Blizzard for the scandals, who are still blaming the entire team for the actions of a few, they are not morally superior. Those things don't define everyone that works there, not all the artists and developers deserved the harassment and death threats they received.

All gaming companies' employee track records are horrible. Crunch is everywhere. There's Bungie, Ubisoft, Microsoft, CD Project...

The fact you can't see the massive milestone something like GTA VI is for Humanity or art, is just so disrespectful. GTA 6 will be the closest thing we have to a real-life sim, not just because of the graphics, but the overall system of making a massive city feel alive and that good in a screen, with 2026's hardware limitations which are still significant for this genre of game. So many tried, like Watch Dogs or Cyberpunk, but they failed. As a software engineer, Rockstar Games are still some of the best technical achievements the Gaming Industry has, regardless of how greedy they are, the content you get for 60-80$ is already insanely good.

And trust me, I hate Rockstar for introducing the MK, for GTA+, for their content being too repetitive too: drive to point A, kill bad guys, steal something, drive to point B. FarmVille-type of farming drugs or cars to sell, time-gated, just to make a few thousand in-game currency and buy a car that feels the same to drive as any other. That's probably how most of the Online content feels in both. They feel like a Mobile game in that regard. Even then I can still see the massive value in this new game and the hype is so damn easy to understand, I am so tired of seeing these comments, bro. I once saw a kid say he was more excited for Deltarune than GTA 6. It doesn't make you cooler, smarter or special to say something big and trendy like GTA 6 or a Christopher Nolan movie like Odyssey which is getting a lot of similar flak from people who want to sound profound. It just makes you look like a pessimist contrarian. There is valid criticism in everything, but come on, man. Come on.