this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
281 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

86217 readers
3333 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] derAbsender@piefed.social 72 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

I Just dont understand why everyone seemingly make EVs ugly on purpose...

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The secretly don’t want to manufacture them so they make them look like shit?

Obviously they can be made to look normal, the Ford Lightning & Mach E, Lucid, Polestar, and even a Tesla all look pretty normal and arguably some look really nice. But ask a mainstream manufacturer to make an EV car and they look stupid half the time. The Prius finally doesn’t look like it’s trying to virtue signal with its ugliness, so designs can be improved too.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

But ask a mainstream manufacturer to make an EV car and they look stupid half the time.

IMO, it's probably more that they overdesign them. They want the EV to look futuristic and unique compared to their regular cars, but their cars already look like that to some degree, and so they overcook the design into looking like some science fiction vehicle. Take the Ferrari, for example, they tried to make it have a floating arch where the hood would normally be.

That's fine for a movie or video game, but in real life, coupled with the practical limits, it just doesn't look very good.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The Ferrari was designed by Jony Ive. It definitely looks like something he would design. He's all about clean, minimalist design where everything is utilitarian.

Ferrari as a brand is about beautiful extravagant design in the fastest and least useful vehicles on the planet.

I can't think of a less synergistic combination that Ferrari and Jony Ive.

Better fits for Jony Ive would be Hyundai, Kia, BMW and Mercedes. Those four are making some ugly ass cars that need to go back to the drawing board.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

So, you are Ferrari and you hire the designer of the fucking original translucent iMac.

The Luce is the iFerrari.

[–] 0tan0d@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I think the Cadillac is doing a good job with their new EV design. They do a good job of making it look like a Cadillac but better.

[–] labsin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I don't agree on the Prius. The 2026 version has worse consumption and a smaller trunk so it could look more like any other SUV. People buy these cause they are the best economics for the size and Toyota made it more like "what they think a phev suv should look like". I'd say that's the opposite of your point.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

2024 and 2026 Prius both show 57/56 city/highway economy on fueleconomy.gov for the most economic models. The 2022 shows 54/50, the 2019 58/53.

So it looks like average economy has improved.

As for cargo, that’s unfortunate to lose space, but if they can get more people to buy the car because it looks more “normal” then that’s better, no?

[–] formation@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Dont throw sense their way 😅

More people using less fossil fuels = better always

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Tesla look like poo. Polestar are nicer by a mile but the backwindow is veey EV aesthetic

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's two big reasons.

No front grill

So much of a brand's identity can be carried by the grill and headlights. And on an EV, there's no need for a grill. But just a slab of flat metal looks weird, so they add stuff to break it up.

Drag

The range of an EV is a lot more sensitive to drag than an ICE car.

So in order to reduce the drag, shapes are smoothed out.

Aero efficiency becomes a much bigger priority than looks.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

I think you're right, but optimising for drag is going to change all cars into the same thing. If brands want to retain any kind of identifiable look, they need the engineering to give them some slack.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I just don't like that so many of them are fucking hatchbacks. I just want a sedan (that isn't a god damned Tesla).

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

The Taycan is gorgeous.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

The 80s racing Volvo station wagon was sick.

[–] majster@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think no one competes with Tesla Model 3 because they're behind on tech. Only BMW i4 is in the same category I think.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Except BYD cars. One of the reasons the US government is so furiously keeping them out is because their technological superiority to all American cars, including Tesla, would destroy the current American car market. All that and they are ridiculously cheaper.

[–] metermatic26@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

That reminds me of the Opel Ampera. The original 2013 model was a decent looking sedan.

But every new model in that line has been a fugly hatchback…

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What's wrong with hatchbacks for you? Is it just the appearance? Genuinely curious. Toyota Crown is a fastback sedan, although it's quite tall and I assume the rear glass is a liftback.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I just don't like that style of car.

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

I actually really like the look of my Renault Megane E-Tech
Battery could be better, but else I'm really happy with it - and the look of it

[–] Toga77@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Also completely subjective..

The Ferrari Ev looks sick as do Hyundai's offerings and hell even the new Prius is pretty cool. (I know it's a hybrid)

Maybe you just have a really narrow scope of appreciation lol.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

The fact that you're mentioning it in the same sentence as a Hyundai is the problem with the Ferrari design. It just looks like a much cheaper car.

[–] Ydna@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

I agree, debates about the ugliness or attractiveness of inanimate objects are very confusing.

[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

So people won't buy them. O&G companies still own the auto industry.

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

they’re trying to compete with Renault’s handsome EV designs

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

The Renault 5 EV is really cool.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

People who drive gas cars personally, make ugly EVs. They don't build cars for themselves, they build cars for what their prejudiced minds about EV drivers are.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't now if I'd call this ugly.

Xiaomi SU7

Up to 1548 Hp...