2112
fair share? (discuss.tchncs.de)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

And as soon as that happens, those companies will start generating massive profits and paying their pittance (still in the billions btw) to other countries. It will also destroy the American job market and leave millions of people destitute.

As much as it sucks, these billion (now trillion) dollar companies produce the lion’s share of America’s wealth. If they take their profits elsewhere, you can say ‘goodbye’ to the world order that the US is almost solely propping up.

[-] kugel7c@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

they take their profits elsewhere, you can say ‘goodbye’ to the world order that the US is almost solely propping up.

I'm fairly sure in some way that's what most of this sub should want explicitly, but while you imagine that necessarily as a slide backwards, I'm fairly convinced if the US ever gets to a wealth Tax their world order is already collapsing, and we are collectively transitioning to a better one. A world order based on actual global democratic decisions, instead of US Neo-imperialist domination perhaps.

[-] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

You assume that most of these companies wouldn't just move to a single destination that wouldn't do the same shit that America did, which is to cater to rich people so that they can generate massive wealth for themselves and the governments of that nation. Unless the entire population of the world decides on a system that's not like this one, it won't happen; period. It'll just shift elsewhere.

And no matter how bad America is, I can imagine worse alternatives (hint: China)

[-] kugel7c@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Yes how about trying to imagine better alternatives instead of assuming everything impossible then.

If the US led world order collapses that might be bad temporarily for US residents and it would be a great win for almost everyone else, almost by necessity. Again many winners few losers, much like the wealth tax. And not everyone needs to actually take up a better system, this is completely true in our current system already.

[-] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's such a narrow take. It won't just be 'bad temporarily for US citizens' if the only country that's a counter to China ceases to be a pre-eminent world player.

[-] kugel7c@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

You know the world has other places than China and the US right. And that the us can still be a very powerful country without being the current hegemon. Certainly a welath tax wouldn't achieve such impressive collapse in less than a few decades. The only real problem with a complete downfall of us hegemony might actually be the Taiwan situation.

But literally all of africa and south America would be in a much better situation if the US wouldn't continue to have the power to protect some of its more historic foreign assets large parts of SEA and the middle east would also have much to celebrate.

You seem strangely scared of china while having little empathy towards anyone that might be suffering under US aligned rule. My take isn't narrow but your view of the world might be. If you are at least from the US I might understand somewhat, if not then yikes.

[-] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh shit, now I get it. Sorry, didn't know you were a tankie.

[-] kugel7c@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Lower income countries, which have historically had little to no say on global tax rules, continue to be hit harder by global tax abuse. While most annual tax losses are suffered by higher income countries ($433 billion), these losses are equivalent to 9 per cent of higher income countries public health budgets. Lower incomes countries’ tax losses ($47 billion) are equivalent to half (49 per cent) of their public health budgets. Quelle

This system is propped up by UK and led US world order, so the US prevents other countries from feeling the benefit of their resources and labour, it's a really common complaint.

It also prevents proper tracing of the Stagering 1.8 trillion dollars in annual revenue of organised crime, and guess what most of the welath doesn't end up back in south America or SEA ...

All the nation states are garbage the US is currently the worst just simply because it is the most powerful and protects it's interests, naturally the second most powerful one seems threatening, but it's mostly a paper tiger, and yes it's still worse than anything but the us because it's the second most powerful and so on and so on...

I don't particularly care which modern empire is still raping Africa(...), I'm mostly just saying throw the greatest rapist out first and then continue until they are all gone.

Telling the world opposition against US ideals is a universally bad take is like telling Ukrainians that defending their country is a bad take.

China US and Russia can all be imperialistic assholes in different ways and relying on one for protection against another isn't actually a particularly good deal for any third party.

But the simple fact that I don't like US superiority gets you to label me tankie, it's simply a little bit of a US centric take.

[-] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

So what's your solution to all this? Because if the US is down, you know China will emerge as the next hegemon and they're magnitudes worse.

[-] kugel7c@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I just fundamentally don't believe there needs to be a Hegemon and also don't agree that china will necessarily be able/willing to actually assume that role. There is at best circumstantial evidence for that scenario. Especially because the US doesn't cease to exist and is likely able to oppose china when it matters. Why is there no future where the power distribution is more diffuse, where there are other significant players, where decision making in the context of the world is actually made through good dialogue, or god forbid super national democratic institutions.

Where is the evidence for china becoming a Hegemon being the only possible conclusion of the US not being one. I fundamentally don't see it except the few times a year where i stumble over a piece written by the US military industrial complex.

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
2112 points (96.6% liked)

Lefty Memes

4378 readers
78 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS