this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
177 points (97.8% liked)

PC Gaming

14902 readers
538 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Pretty sure thats actually illegal in the US because you are legally obligated to do what makes the board and investors the most money.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Only if it is publicly traded. A private company can do whatever they want, with some legal exceptions.

[–] EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

The need to act in the best interest of the shareholders, if they are making less immediate profits to make more gains long term they can easily make that argument. Convincing the board not to replace you and hire someone that will ride the bubble til it pops is a different story.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 4 points 13 hours ago

That's up for interpretation. Arguing the AI bubble will burst and that this sets up the company for an excellent position post-pop could be argued to eventually net the most money. But it's a hard sell.