this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
187 points (97.9% liked)

PC Gaming

14902 readers
529 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FatVegan@leminal.space -4 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

Valve generated like 17 billion dollars "recently" according to a quick google search. Apparently they don't disclose their earnings. But how is that even possible to "need more money" that they have?

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 11 points 16 hours ago

17 billions is pretty small change in setting up your own ram manufacturing.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 12 points 18 hours ago

The Chips bill meant to boost semiconductor fabs in the US was for 280 billion. And that wasn't even to get on par with what Taiwan was making.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 17 points 20 hours ago

Did you know that for every number there is in fact a larger number?

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 14 hours ago

Fundamental computer hardware like cpu/gpu wafers and the stuff that goes into RAM is EXTREMELY hard to make at all, let alone at any remotely competitive level. And the people currently running it in the world have had a LOT of time to get VERY good at it.

Instead of tens of billions, you'd need hundreds of billions just to get started. Plus, Valve probably doesn't want to try to compete and then get destroyed by one of those companies, essentially killing themselves in the process. They probably generally want to just stay in their lane and not overextend. They just started supporting a brand new entire operating system now, and that's probably enough, for now. Maybe in the future if everything is really successful?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago

Try that argument at work. "Guys, we made enough money this year!"