this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
360 points (85.3% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

3422 readers
558 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can be working towards voter reform and be voting for Democrats at the same time. They aren't mutually exclusive.

[–] SaltyAmerican@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So your plan is to work towards voter reform while supporting the politicians that do not want voter reform?

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm sure some Democrats would like it, there's people who run on that platform. It's better than letting Republicans win at least.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I’m sure some Democrats would like it,

They might claim to. They'll find the no votes.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As opposed to the Republicans who would never go for voter reform?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Republicans do what they run on.

Democrats don't.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So your solution is to what, not vote?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your solution is to support democrats, but only when they're fighting progressives and supporting genocide.

No question mark.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah, that's dumb.

I'll vote Democrat to keep Republicans out of office, while doing things outside of voting to make real long term change. You know, things like voter reform. Just because they are both bad doesn't mean I'll just hand the reins over to the worst of them.

Seems a lot better than smugly looking down on people.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Like making the assumption that anyone who has a problem with genocide is a nonvoter.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Then who are you voting for then? Which party?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I like to vote for the Greens

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How's that been working out? I see sometimes they win local stuff

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

they got the Democrat nominee to champion their banner initiative: green new deal.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (2 children)

So... The best is that the Democrats say they are going to do it?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

the most successful so-called third party in history got a constitutional amendment. as far as I know, they didn't win any congressional seats.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So voting third party is effectively useless to keep Republicans out of office

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

doesn't seem effective at keeping Democrats out of office either. voting for Democrats doesn't seem to keep Republicans out of office, either. maybe you should reconsider your goals for you vote.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Gee whiz I didn't realize there were the same amount of Democrats in office as third party members

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I didn't say anything about that.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So, considering my goals are to keep Republicans out of office, and you admitted that third party people aren't effective in doing that, why would I vote third party? At least in Nationals. Local I feel like they have more of a shot.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

voting for Democrats doesn't keep Republicans out of office. in fact, even if Democrats beat Republicans, the Republicans still take office (gw bush, Dr oz, many others)

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

.... There's been lots of times Democrats have been in office and not Republicans so that didn't make sense like, at all.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago

when was the last time Republicans weren't in office? 1860??

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I mean, democrats don't offer anything better. They just lie about what they're going to do, then do the only thing they're for: selling weapons for genocide.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I voted for democrats last election. You got a party that manipulated the situation where the least insane vote was for them. That wasn't enough for you. You want everyone to be as happy as you are about it.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who said I'm happy about it? Have you not read what I said? I'm just saying they are the shit sandwich that isn't on fire and covered in glass

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So why are you trying to convince me to vote how I already voted in an election that already happened?

Are you hoping for a repeat of us being stuck with a genocide candidate with no primary?

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No dingus I'm trying to keep Republicans out of office

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Provided their opponent isn't a progressive.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So what's your solution for keeping Republicans out of office?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Stop interfering in primaries. Keep your promises. Stop supporting genocide.

You'd prefer fascism.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world -2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Wtf no, I'm asking you for what you, personally, are doing to keep Republicans out of office. What's your strategy, how do you vote, what have you found to be effective? I'd gladly stop voting for Democrats if you have a more effective strategy.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Same as you. Voting for democrats.

Unlike you, I'm not going to expect everyone to be happy to vote for genocidal shit like you want.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

What gave the impression I was happy about voting for Democrats? Was it when I said they were a shit sandwich, or the several times I said I didn't like them?

You're literally doing the things I'm doing and I'm agreeing with you, I have no idea why you're mad at me now

[–] SaltyAmerican@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah, so you're a moderate and think both sides are the same, got it

[–] SaltyAmerican@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, I'm a communist that sees your parties from the outside, their differences are superficial and their similarities are vast

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"both sides bad" is such a juvenile take. It's myopic. Yes, both sides are bad, but one side is clearly worse than the other. Not being able to handle that shows an inability to let go of binary thinking.

There's a difference between a stubbed toe and a broken leg, and looking down on people who don't want a broken leg and are trying to keep the "break everyone's legs" party out of power is just dumb.

[–] SaltyAmerican@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's liberals with the binary thinking. There are no 2 sides bad because the US is run by one oligarchy, and it's bad. There is no good shade of fascism.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Again, because you didn't seen to grasp this, there's bad, and then there's worse. Yes, both are bad. We get that, you're a good communist. But you don't think that Mamdani is the same level of evil as Trump, do you?

[–] SaltyAmerican@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Demsocs keep you rounded up in the oligarchy with delusions that things will get better while they still exploit the global south and cater first to the wealthy

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Yeah, and? Republicans are worse than that. I already know Democrats are bad.