this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
9 points (90.9% liked)

Asklemmy

54645 readers
1055 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think i've only once flat out told one it was wrong about a specific assertion I quoted and it immediately was able to find its way to what I knew to be the correct claim.

I just wonder what would happen if i was in fact mistaken and I told it confidently it was wrong without elaborating

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

I'm trying not to judge and to just remain curious here. Why would you keep using AI like that?

[โ€“] affenlehrer@feddit.org 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

You can use LLMs for things that where not possible or very difficult with traditional search engines.

E.g. I wanted to know what kind of brake my daughters bike used. Traditionally I'd either have to research all possible brake types and compare then with her bike or take a photo and post it to a forum or reddit or something and hope someone knows the answer.

With ChatGPT (I only use the free version) I just took a photo and asked what kind of break it was and got a (actually good) list of 2 possible brakes. It was one of the two.

Very convenient. However, I'm aware how LLMs work and what their limitations are. Of course also the environmental issues.

BTW: It was a band brake.

[โ€“] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago

Because search engines have been dogshit for the past 2 years (give or take~); AI need to be steered hard but as long as you're asking for sources (and don't just read what they're saying) you can get an answer out of them.

I only find what I'm searching for on Google if I already know the exact keywords for what I'm specifically looking for (...and even then...); if I don't know the exact terms of what I'm looking for (like @affenlehrer@feddit.org with his bike brake issue) then google is useless nowadays, which wasn't always true. So now my process is to google first, ask an AI second, and I end up using AIs way more than I would like.

[โ€“] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

It led them to the right answer. That's positive reinforcement.