this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
438 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

88475 readers
3378 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mysteryhumpf@feddit.org 134 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (47 children)

Burning gas is so extremely bad that even throwing away your old ICE car and buying a new electric car is better than driving the ICE car until it „falls apart“. This was the research finding in Switzerland, but this result was so unwelcome that the research got hidden away. https://www.republik.ch/2025/06/11/amtliche-selbstzensur

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

oh wow I didn't know that!

would make sense to give more a lot incentives for EV buying if so!

[–] fulg@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I wish they weren’t so expensive though.

IMO the biggest incentive of all is that the battery exists for the life of the vehicle and can be recycled at the end (the lithium inside does not disappear!), vs the gas which is literally burning money away.

[–] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

They are getting a lot cheaper overall. The EV Bolt is less than $4k more than a Camry. In expensive places like California, or with gas as high as it is, you can quickly make back that additional cost and get ahead over time, especially if you are able to charge from home. And TBH the Bolt isn't that bad of a car, and get's great distance per charge.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (7 children)

That and there's only so much gas, once we burn it all up it'll take millions of years to replenish. Yea, you could say the same about battery materials, but those get reused for what a decade before they start to degrade? And the actual energy is free once we have the means to harvest it (wind, solar etc are all "free" infinite energy so long as we have the panels and turbines)

[–] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That and there’s only so much gas, once we burn it all up it’ll take millions of years to replenish.

Umm, AFAIK, we actually can't make more oil, so there isn't going to be any more gas, just work harder to find what's left. We absolutely should be moving to alternative energies to power civilization.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When I say millions of years I mean the plankton and our decomposing bodies will eventually make some oil, but by then our planet will be gone anyways lol. I'm sure human civilization won't make it to see any more oil produced

[–] ebc@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago

Pretty sure the conditions on the planet when oil/coal formed were substantially different from today. In particular, there are now various organisms which feed on the decaying matter that's at the start of that process. These organisms eat that matter and emit CO2 as they live and breathe, returning the carbon to the air instead of burying underground.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (19 children)

Socialize losses, privatize gains. I don't want my tax money incentivizing some rich asshole to buy an EV. Nobody that needs help buying a car can even consider an EV, their too expensive. The cheapest ev u can buy in USA is 30k, the cheapest ICE is 22k. And people that need help buying cars can't afford either. Only middle class + people are buying these things, and they don't need poor people's tax money to subsidize their purchase from a private corp. I'm all for evs but let's be honest the people buying them DONT need help buying them. Id rather see my tax money go toward renewable infrastructure or research on batteries and such! We can't keep relying on the private industry to fund research, in technology or in medicine or any science imo. But that's just my angry fist wagging opinion as somebody who refuses to spend more than 3k on a car because I'm not made of money. I'm not exactly poor, I'm a home owner under 30 and make around 60-70k a year depending on OT and bonuses. But if I went and got a loan on a Chevy bolt for 30k I would not be able to make my mortgage payments even with subsidies, so why should somebody who makes more get help buying a new car? Horseshit

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There’s more reason to incentives than to “help people who can’t afford new”

  • the faster we develop an EV market, the sooner and cheaper used EVs will be available
  • the incentives get us to price parity sooner, so encourage people who don’t want to spend extra, whether they can or not
  • the faster market transition encourages investment in chargers. If you couldn’t be confident in a fast growing market why would you invest in chargers?
  • the faster market transition encourages and supports legacy manufacturers investing in new technology

EVs are inevitable, but we need to be encouraging a faster transition for environmental reasons. But the incentives were at least as much about trying to save legacy manufacturers as they were about encouraging consumers down that path.

Note that as soon as the US stopped incentives, legacy manufacturers withdrew from the EV market. Some were just reaching price parity, such as Chevy Equinox, but the few remaining choices will never have the volume to be profitable. Now they’re heavily protected, at the cost of less choice and much higher prices for all Americans, but that can’t last forever and they appear to be digging their own graves

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This isn't exactly correct or truthful. A new EV Bolt is only $4k more than a new Camry, and that difference is quickly made up from the gas saving, especially when gas is $4+ a gallon.

And when you want to accelerate adoption of something, you incentivize it. The US already spends $40+ billion in direct subsidies for oil (https://www.americanprogress.org/article/5-hidden-ways-the-government-rigs-the-market-in-favor-of-fossil-fuels/) Imagine instead of giving that to oil companies, you used that to accelerate the development of EV's and their roll out.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A comparison of subsidized oil would better be served by having the government subsidize clean energy production and infrastructure. It's not like the government is handing out subsidies to buy gas cars 🤷‍♂️

[–] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

The government is doing that already (IRA law, although a lot of that was pulled back by the current administration). And like oil had, you would need continuous investment, which hasn't happened, so a discounting program to incentivize purchasing seems like the best of both worlds. It seemed pretty effective as well at kicking off early adoption, which was then hampered by inflation, high prices, and government divesting from EV investment.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Everytime you bring it up, you get a whole lot of people with gasoline powered cars getting very angry. Sure batteries are not 'perfect', but they are a whole lot better in almost every way compared to gasoline powered vehicles.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (15 children)

The anger is less about how bad EV's are and more about being expected to buy a hilariously expensive EV when someone has a perfectly functional car. Make them cheaper and people will buy them, because other than the environmental aspect EV's just require less maintenance overall, making them cheaper to run.

[–] Sineljora@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

I’d rather spend $100k converting an old ICE car to electric than give the auto industry another dime. The surveillance crap is literally a life or death decision for me. I have a 20y/o ice car I’ll likely have to convert, so no one try your dumb “new car math” with me.

If any fuckers want to make what I’m doing illegal, people will die.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes THERE is the issue that everyone seems to forget about new cars. I have a project car that I'm thinking will become an EV when it needs an engine because it will be so much easier to deal with. And it won't call home to the feds every day.

[–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Old muscle cars converted to EV I think are so cool. There was a show that converted an old K10 truck and hid the batteries in the bed tool box.
A 80s station wagon, a Country Squire, or 70s luxury cruiser like a Cadillac or Lincoln would be awesome.

EVs, or just newer cars in general, are just so boring and cramped. Not to mention all the connection and surveillance concerns.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Boring, cramped, and almost impossible to see out of.

I think Ford straight-up sells an electric motor swap that will fit right in their older cars.

I have a weird little 4x4 that would be amazing if it were electric. I wouldn't have to worry about getting in a situation where the engine is tilted too much and it's simultaneously starving for fuel and oil.

[–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'd also like to know why Harley acted so ashamed of the Livewire. Probably one of the coolest things they've done up to the Pan America.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They are only hilariously expensive because ICE manufacturers are lobbying to keep Chinese EVs out of your country...

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

As an American who would really like a small truck, I know that. :-(

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

but this result was so unwelcome that the research got hidden away.

the climate, oil industry did not like it was being contradicted.

load more comments (44 replies)