this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
129 points (98.5% liked)

Slop.

870 readers
586 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Entirely unsurprising, but I’m still very tired

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 23 points 5 days ago (2 children)

When you put time and reputation on a film are you not also taking financial risk? If the film flops then odds are you will get less work, and less paying work. This art director was treated like an unpaid intern.

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 4 points 5 days ago

Read the actual statement instead of falling for ragebait.

The art director got paid 300$ a day, which is not like being treated as an unpaid intern

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Reading banmefromposting's screenshot of the thing it kinda sounds like he's hoping that time and reputation will bring connections for people who worked on it, which it probably will

Idk i'm having a hard time getting worked up for the art director, like yeah I'd be mad if something i worked on made millions and i got shit, but also, she got paid almost 7000 for less than a month's work. i'm sure she's struggling but that's nearly a quarter of my yearly income, in a month. And she's got "art director for Obsession" on her resume now, i can't imagine she'll be struggling to find decent work

[–] thefunkycomitatus@hexbear.net 3 points 5 days ago

It's sympathetic because these types of people are usually funded per-project. Yes she made $7000 for less than a month's work but that may be her only work for months to over a year. The hope would be that since this movie has taken off, she would immediately get a bigger project, with better pay and experience less downtime between jobs. But who knows. Since she went on twitter and it set-off a huge struggle-session over there, she might get blacklisted now for complaining.

There's nothing wrong with complaining and discussing one's wages of course. But this is America where you're not allowed to bite the hand that feeds. Lower-level employees on projects should be able to negotiate for percentages of BO but the big companies that pick up these movies won't let that happen. Everyone just gets told "this is the way it is, work harder".