this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
57 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

864 readers
493 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There is just a trove of comments here, I was going to pick out the best, but honestly, there's something in here for everyone.

Ok here is the obvious stand-out:

Also, user KamalaHarrisWaifu has a lot of "takes" in the thread.

I actually have no idea to what extent the cost of Deepseek (or other Chinese models) are subsidized. One thing is true though, the grid these things exist on in China is owned by the state, and not privately owned, which I'm sure changes the calculus. (Not to mention the sheer capacity of said grid being off the charts).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Lol that's some insane cope right there. Also where does the $18k chinese subsidies figure comes from lol. People forgetting that deepseek was just a side hustle?

The only claim you can have about deepseek being subsidized is the entire state-owned infrastructure that supplies critical inputs like energy, but at that point you're conceding that socialism is a better system.