this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
57 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

865 readers
393 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There is just a trove of comments here, I was going to pick out the best, but honestly, there's something in here for everyone.

Ok here is the obvious stand-out:

Also, user KamalaHarrisWaifu has a lot of "takes" in the thread.

I actually have no idea to what extent the cost of Deepseek (or other Chinese models) are subsidized. One thing is true though, the grid these things exist on in China is owned by the state, and not privately owned, which I'm sure changes the calculus. (Not to mention the sheer capacity of said grid being off the charts).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gayspacemarxist@hexbear.net 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Deepseek models are infamously inexpensive compared to the American models. That's their whole claim to fame. They can charge low prices because it only cost like a few hundred million US to train their last two gen of models, compared to the several billions that OAI and Anthropic have each dropped.

I'm guessing there's some subsidies going on, but they also have better business fundamentals and a functional green grid to work with.