this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
57 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
864 readers
381 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments



I remember a bunch of people complaining about the shift from ChatGPT 4 to 5 and how 5 "lacked warmth" and "felt robotic." Comparing some of the responses (this is the only context in which I use ChatGPT), I actually found 5 to be much less obnoxious. It acted like a machine instead of a cloying manipulative sycophant.
I literally can't stand using western models partly because of this. They just deep throat it the whole conversation. Chinese models are much more likely to just do the task and shut it. The worst part is recent western models try to be quippy or talk like they're your buddy i guess? Like I've noticed some of them will now start responses with something along the lines of: "Oh, dang! That's a pretty interesting thing!" or like when I was showing Google Gemini an error log and asked it to pick out the errors I needed so I didn't have to read the whole thing it would be like "Look at that! We're so close to this thing working! 90% of the way there. Just one little thing needs fixed..." ugh, shut the fuck up. Do what I asked machine. Why do they insist on making it talk like that? It's gross.
They wanted a cloying manipulative sycophant
I want my robots to feel robotic