politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
America is being exploited by Trump is what is implied, not by Iran.
Thats not what the comment says.
"Iranians say addressing Trump’s 'mental illness' head on helped secure deal: journalist"
~~addressing~~ exploiting
The comment is implying Trump is being exploited and America is paying the price for Iran's exploitation of Trump.
The comment says there are many victims, referencing the fact that it's not just Iranians who have suffered because of Trump's senility and evil. You're choosing to read it differently than it was intended.
Both can be true. Iran took advantage of Trump's mental illness to get what they wanted. They deserved it, but it's a costly deal for the American people. I and everyone with a brain blame Trump.
Honestly this is a raw deal for the world in general. Oil will now forever be slightly more expensive due to the tolls. Iran will come out of this stronger and that's bad for the world too.
We watched the two school yard bullies go at it and the one that started it lost. Which is fun to watch, but honestly nothing is materially better for anyone. We still have a fledgling fascist theocracy and an autocratic theocracy.
The fledgling theocracy will probably thrash and cause more issues globally and the existing theocracy will use it's wealth to expand its local power.
Issues Iran has caused: defeating ISIS, helping Lebanon defend itself from America's attack dog Israel, helping Yemen defend itself from America's other vassal, Saudi Arabia.
You're still uncritically accepting same "both sides" bullshit the US uses to prevent opposition to imperialism. A place not having your ideal government doesn't mean its good when the US keeps it weak by starving its people, finding some fascists to arm, and/or bombing them.
Iran being able to stand up to the US is fundamentally a good thing. Maybe we'll even see social progress now that they're not facing an existential threat.
News flash geopolitics isn't a fucking sports match. Sometimes both sides are evil and the average person always loses.
You can hate the US and a literal theocracy that executes women for being raped.
Why would you expect them to have any social progress? They constantly prop up Islamic extremists is surrounding states. They want their neighbors to be theocracies too. They want their neighbors to allow honor killings, to restrict the movements and agency of women, and to punish anyone that doesn't follow their holy laws. It's hilarious how you can clearly see the USA's geopolitical goals and machinations and ignore Iran's. Basically the only thing they have right is not supporting Israel.
What happened in Iran will not stop the USA's meddling in foreign countries. Maybe things will change during midterms or next presidential election, but I won't hold my breath.
All this has done has strengthened a theocracy to spread its oppression. There's absolutely no reason for a better funded Iran to step back from their decades long goals. The opposite actually.
The average person in either country lost. I'm sorry real life can't be as simple as you want it.
They prop up the people who are opposed to their enemies. Same reason the US props up extremists. Iran's actions are easily modeled pragmatic responses to geopolitical reality, and quite poorly as religiously driven, otherwise they wouldn't sometimes fund Sunni groups who they fundamentally disagree with.
You know Marx would have a term for those that go out of their way to support a theocracy over and Imperialist nation.
Class traitor
We could argue the pros and cons of each nation, but why? All we are arguing about is two large nations trying to impress their will upon smaller nations. Neither is good for the people of the smaller nations.
Countless Yemenis, Palestinians, Lebanese people are defending themselves from literal genocide with Iranian weapons. Don't bothsides this shit.
Thats not what that means lmao
Cool story class traitor
Go ahead an pick your preferred oppressor. Capital or religion your choice. I'll chose the people