this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
479 points (99.2% liked)

politics

30080 readers
2445 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Investigative reporter Jeremy Scahill shared a startling revelation last week that Iranian negotiators had recruited psychologists to help navigate what they believed was Trump’s “impaired mental state.” And on Monday, Scahill provided an update on Iran’s unique approach to the negotiations, which he said Tehran partially credited for Sunday’s success.

“Senior Iranian psychologists began working with the negotiating team to try to cater the messages that the Iranians were sending via mediators back to Donald Trump to try to take into account what they say as his specific mental illness and mental deficiencies,” Scahill said in an interview with Democracy Now published on Monday.

“Almost quite clinically, they said they began to see this process yielding results as they worked with psychologists to send these communications to Donald Trump, and they credit that, in part, with getting to this point where Trump finally accepted some version of his manufactured and almost entirely false victory narrative.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

The fledgling theocracy will probably thrash and cause more issues globally

Issues Iran has caused: defeating ISIS, helping Lebanon defend itself from America's attack dog Israel, helping Yemen defend itself from America's other vassal, Saudi Arabia.

You're still uncritically accepting same "both sides" bullshit the US uses to prevent opposition to imperialism. A place not having your ideal government doesn't mean its good when the US keeps it weak by starving its people, finding some fascists to arm, and/or bombing them.

Iran being able to stand up to the US is fundamentally a good thing. Maybe we'll even see social progress now that they're not facing an existential threat.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

News flash geopolitics isn't a fucking sports match. Sometimes both sides are evil and the average person always loses.

You can hate the US and a literal theocracy that executes women for being raped.

Why would you expect them to have any social progress? They constantly prop up Islamic extremists is surrounding states. They want their neighbors to be theocracies too. They want their neighbors to allow honor killings, to restrict the movements and agency of women, and to punish anyone that doesn't follow their holy laws. It's hilarious how you can clearly see the USA's geopolitical goals and machinations and ignore Iran's. Basically the only thing they have right is not supporting Israel.

What happened in Iran will not stop the USA's meddling in foreign countries. Maybe things will change during midterms or next presidential election, but I won't hold my breath.

All this has done has strengthened a theocracy to spread its oppression. There's absolutely no reason for a better funded Iran to step back from their decades long goals. The opposite actually.

The average person in either country lost. I'm sorry real life can't be as simple as you want it.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz -2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They constantly prop up Islamic extremists is surrounding states

They prop up the people who are opposed to their enemies. Same reason the US props up extremists. Iran's actions are easily modeled pragmatic responses to geopolitical reality, and quite poorly as religiously driven, otherwise they wouldn't sometimes fund Sunni groups who they fundamentally disagree with.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You know Marx would have a term for those that go out of their way to support a theocracy over and Imperialist nation.

Class traitor

We could argue the pros and cons of each nation, but why? All we are arguing about is two large nations trying to impress their will upon smaller nations. Neither is good for the people of the smaller nations.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Countless Yemenis, Palestinians, Lebanese people are defending themselves from literal genocide with Iranian weapons. Don't bothsides this shit.

Class traitor

Thats not what that means lmao

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Cool story class traitor

Go ahead an pick your preferred oppressor. Capital or religion your choice. I'll chose the people