this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
42 points (97.7% liked)

Linux

65774 readers
666 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What's the difference for a real user between using X11 or Wayland nowdays? I haven't found anything useful on the internet, so I'm asking you. Internet articles on the topic (and about WMs too) seem to be advertising slop since they explain anything but the real things. Also, if anyone used the XLibre fork, I would love to hear about your experience with it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 17 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
  • for most people, use whatever your distro ships with and installs for you
  • choosing desktop environments still starts heated discussions – high end, it’s a choice between Gnome and KDE – mid-tier has Xfce, LXQt, Mate, Cinnamon, and more – limited hardware go for IceWM, JWM, FLWM, or similar – want to get your hands dirty? go for a tiling window manager
  • X11 is (effectively) abandonware at this point – it’s still getting security patches, but the devs left and started Wayland 17-ish years ago
  • XLibre is more political than technical – and I’ll leave it at that
[–] pixeldaemon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)
[–] juipeltje@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Mainly their readme being fully magat-pilled, talking about DEI and whatnot. They also waste time on things like renaming functions to own the libs. It's not a project that i put any trust into and i'd rather use plain X11 if i had to go back.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

If we ignore the deeply disturbing political views of the Creator the entire project is meant to be a statement. There's a conspiracy theory that there was a grand plot to kill x11 by red hat and xlibre is built upon the idea that red hat was holding it back. This completely ignores the real issues that the codebase was pure spaghetti.

[–] pixeldaemon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

I heard that XLibre developers are working on cleaning the codebase. And I strongly believe we still need X11 at least until Wayland is polished enough, which still seems untrue even in 2026. The concerns about Red Hat are not conspiracy, a commercial corporation controlling important parts of Linux ecosystem is a serious threat, so having an alternative is never bad. Linux won't have a future if everyone just uses Red Hat approved solutions.

[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 1 points 53 minutes ago

https://github.com/X11Libre/xserver/pull/56

Here is the x11libre dev not understanding what the ^ operand does in C. Would you trust running this person's code as a display server?

Sure. No one expects anyone to know everything from the start, and people improve with time. But this was metux's understanding of C when he forked off xorg thinking he could do better than freedesktop.

[–] Yoddel_Hickory@piefed.ca 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You know that "until Wayland is polished enough" is at least a year ago for the overwhelming majority of people, right?

[–] rihatsu@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

A year ago I got a new PC, installed Ubuntu 24.04 which defaults to Wayland, and installed discord. Push to talk wouldn't work unless discord had mouse focus. I spent a few hours researching and trying different things before switching to X11 where it just immediately works.

Tell me more about how polished Wayland is.

[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 1 points 1 hour ago

That is a feature. Allowing arbitrary programs to read any key press is how you get keyloggers.

Wayland has a protocol to request reading keys out of focus (which will ask the user for permission, as opposed to just read it like on xorg).

If the program was running in xwayland (which it probably was) of course it won't use that protocol, and will just try to read it X11 style.

In some DEs (KDE) you can select if X11 apps are allowed to read keys.

"I switched to X11 and it immediately works". I'll give you another tip: if you run chmod 777 -R / the file manager stops pestering about permissions and it immediately works.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 8 hours ago

Two things, one as previously mentioned the codebase is a mess and even the best developers working on x11 tend to introduce regressions (the xlibre dev isn't so this is amplified). Second it absolutely is a conspiracy because red hat did everything in the power to save x11 until eventually they just kept using it (tbh it needed to be replaced two decades ago). As for your last point linux won't have a future if its aggressively held back by an army of enthusiasts who demand things never change and fragmented until software support is non-existent.

[–] mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

The Linux ecosystem would whither and die without the likes of Red Hat.