this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
469 points (97.8% liked)
me_irl
7869 readers
3429 users here now
All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Tell me: what's the canonical age that it's ok for people find out that big butts exist and that is an acceptable beauty standard? You're kind of coming across a bit racist-y here, if you apparently don't have a problem with white standards of eroticisation and suddenly have a problem if the beauty standards are those of PoC.
... i literally scrobbled to the line "literally everything covered with hair" and you don't get the innuendo? Disney announces their first (almost) openly gay character for the third time and it's how that other guy who's swooning for Gaston every minute.
Do you see the three women? Gaston. Fucks.
Can't comment on anything about what you find attractive, but you do you, man!
But just cause you don't find it attractive, doesn't mean it's not there. Don't come complaining to me, if you're underserved, homie. I ain't the problem.
Before that, I was not starting a logical argument. What "logic" have I introduced that you're referencing. You're inventing strawmen. If not: what "logic" are you referencing.
Let's just pretend that this supposed "sensitivity" you're talking about didn't exist: Could you actually explain this supposed "problematic"ness? Because I sure don't get it. What kinds of horrors has watching Lilo and Stitch corrupted in your precious little child's mind?
Not one real person gets objectified here. They're not doing anything erotic, they're just... there. Where's the problem? Should they be wearing Nun-outfits? Sexy Nuns, even maybe?
If that actually were the case: Why would that have been a problem for me? What should it bother you how I've lived through my sexual development?
Also: You do know that a twelve year old has enough people their age where they can watch the whatever teenagers find hot these days? (I would guess thick hips never go out of style)
Umm... ok, so I should not insult it when it's about them being oblivious to things that aren't part of their daily live. But insulting the minor's mind is ok if it's about their precious little minds being corrupted by impure thoughts of "thiccc hips 🍑"? /s Grow up.
You brought up 12 year olds, now I can't say "teenager"? O.o
That kind of sounds like good, old body-shaming to me, buddy.
So now I'm racist for pointing out that the statues are specifically about celebrating fertility? This absurd? You sound like you're yanking out straws just to pin anything on me rather than tackling the point.
First of all, the video started at 0:00, and second of all, how does your point even relate to what I'm saying? Are you sure you're not assuming things? You do realize that my point is primarily about body image and only secondary about serving sexual content to kids?
Literally pulling shit out of your ass.
I can, and that's precisely why I find it problematic. I'm not sure you understand, though, by the looks of the shit you're saying.
Yeah, let's just close our eyes and pretend the problem isn't there. Never mind the fact that the meme itself exemplifies the suggestive poses and one is eagle spread on a surfboard and the other is checking out her ass. And that's not even my point about the messaging to young GIRLS. The lot of you are only defending your own interests here.
Case in point.
Teenage start at thirTEEN. 12 is the upper bound but I've been repeatedly referring to 9 year-olds.
You're so disingenuous and throwing shit at the wall.
What's racist is having a problem with beauty standards from cultures of PoC, while accepting european beauty standards.
The timestamp is 2m05s. Look it up.
So, what's your point exactly? That people with broad hips aren't supposed to be shown? What exactly is your point about the "body image"? You still failed to give a concise answer.
That sure is a way not to respond in an argument. I interpret that as you giving up.
Sure. And I can do one handed pull-ups. I just don't want to. /s
What? She is sitting on a surfboard. How else is she supposed to sit. Have you ever been on a surfboard? And the one shot where she's "checking out her ass" has no sexual connotations. It was cooldown of a tense action scene and shows her being self-conscious about her weight. You probably never watched the movie. So don't just state shit you know nothing about.
Was your point that you're asking creepy questions? Because then I agree. Otherwise, I restate that it's not shameful for (pre-)teens to explore their sexuality at their own pace.
Oh, yeah. Really big difference, Herr Obersturmbandführer of the sematics nazis. /s
So, are you implying that broad hips spoil the youth into being sexually more active at an earlier age? Helen Lovejoy much?
Nah, you're just body shaming and/or a puritan Helen Lovejoy.
The fuck are you on about, did my point really escape you that hard that you have to go all stupid about it? You don't even get it but you keep talking shit and giving shitty arguments. 🤣
Respond to what, your bullshit? Give me a break. You're a pigeon on a chessboard. you don't even know what you're doing.
See? Pulling shit out of your ass again. You don't know me.
Is yours playing stupid?
Not only is your reply shitty af, but like it or not, a year in a child's life IS a big difference. You gotta learn about the developmental cycle somewhere, I guess.
You're literally arguing against yourself. That's note even my point, dumbass. 😂
You never clearly stated your goddamn point, troll.
If I haven't, then wtf are you even defending against? Your imagination? You're all up in arms about it because you know that what you think you're defending is sketchy af. And you're only doing it because you found it arousing.
Sure, Mrs Lovejoy. /s