me_irl

7869 readers

3429 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

herrwoland@lemmy.world

469

Me_irl (lemmy.today)

submitted 2 days ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/me_irl@lemmy.world

94 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

What's racist is having a problem with beauty standards from cultures of PoC, while accepting european beauty standards.

The timestamp is 2m05s. Look it up.

So, what's your point exactly? That people with broad hips aren't supposed to be shown? What exactly is your point about the "body image"? You still failed to give a concise answer.

Literally pulling shit out of your ass.

That sure is a way not to respond in an argument. I interpret that as you giving up.

I can, and that's precisely why I find it problematic. I'm not sure you understand, though, by the looks of the shit you're saying.

Sure. And I can do one handed pull-ups. I just don't want to. /s

one is eagle spread on a surfboard and the other is checking out her ass.

What? She is sitting on a surfboard. How else is she supposed to sit. Have you ever been on a surfboard? And the one shot where she's "checking out her ass" has no sexual connotations. It was cooldown of a tense action scene and shows her being self-conscious about her weight. You probably never watched the movie. So don't just state shit you know nothing about.

Case in point.

Was your point that you're asking creepy questions? Because then I agree. Otherwise, I restate that it's not shameful for (pre-)teens to explore their sexuality at their own pace.

Teenage start at thirTEEN. 12 is the upper bound

Oh, yeah. Really big difference, Herr Obersturmbandführer of the sematics nazis. /s

but I've been repeatedly referring to 9 year-olds.

So, are you implying that broad hips spoil the youth into being sexually more active at an earlier age? Helen Lovejoy much?

You're so disingenuous and throwing shit at the wall.

Nah, you're just body shaming and/or a puritan Helen Lovejoy.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

What’s racist is having a problem with beauty standards from cultures of PoC

So, what’s your point exactly?

The fuck are you on about, did my point really escape you that hard that you have to go all stupid about it? You don't even get it but you keep talking shit and giving shitty arguments. 🤣

That sure is a way not to respond in an argument. I interpret that as you giving up.

Respond to what, your bullshit? Give me a break. You're a pigeon on a chessboard. you don't even know what you're doing.

You probably never watched the movie. So don’t just state shit you know nothing about.

See? Pulling shit out of your ass again. You don't know me.

Was your point that you’re asking creepy questions?

Is yours playing stupid?

Oh, yeah. Really big difference, Herr Obersturmbandführer of the sematics nazis. /s

Not only is your reply shitty af, but like it or not, a year in a child's life IS a big difference. You gotta learn about the developmental cycle somewhere, I guess.

So, are you implying that broad hips spoil the youth into being sexually more active at an earlier age?

Nah, you’re just body shaming and/or a puritan Helen Lovejoy.

You're literally arguing against yourself. That's note even my point, dumbass. 😂

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That's note even my point, dumbass. 😂

You never clearly stated your goddamn point, troll.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

If I haven't, then wtf are you even defending against? Your imagination? You're all up in arms about it because you know that what you think you're defending is sketchy af. And you're only doing it because you found it arousing.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 hours ago

Sure, Mrs Lovejoy. /s