this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
53 points (77.9% liked)

science

27421 readers
574 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CeffTheCeph@kbin.earth 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Haha! Thank you so much for this comment!

I am currently writing a Master's thesis on complex adaptive systems and have been having such a hard time coming to terms with how the reductivist worldview completely dominates western science, including neurobiology.

To be fair, I think even Penrose still holds this Platonic view and is desperate to find the mechanistic process of wavefunction collapse through gravity, somehow suggesting that gravity is responsible for the appearance of our conscious thoughts in our heads?? I don't know, I'm probably interpreting it all wrong, I'm not an expert on Quantum Gravity.

I've just been convinced by my dog that I have a more developed level of conciseness compared to him, just as he has a more developed sense of smell compared to me.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

mechanistic process of wavefunction collapse through gravity, somehow suggesting that gravity is responsible for the appearance of our conscious thoughts in our heads??

I mean, it's the same question as Plato's cave, or "if a tree falls in the forest..."

It's not new, we just have more science to describe it.

But that's a different question entirely.

I’ve just been convinced by my dog that I have a more developed level of conciseness compared to him, just as he has a more developed sense of smell compared to me.

No, what sets human apart is how we can communicate in detail and specifics. A single human conciouness sucks, it needs to learn from others. Just like a well trained dog will seem smart. It can't speak, but it can listen if someone teaches it.

Which is why shit gets so fucked up when people stop communicating and get tribal about shit. And why nothing speeds up technological advances than increasing communication speed, up to a point which caused the current plateau.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 1 day ago

I don't always agree with your takes but I'm certainly glad I didn't block you. Really digging your thoughts itt. Thanks for sharing them.

[–] CeffTheCeph@kbin.earth 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, it's the same question as Plato's cave Did you read Penrose's "Shadows of the Mind"? The 'shadows' is a specific reference to Plato's cave.

No, what sets human apart is how we can communicate in detail and specifics. A single human conciouness sucks, it needs to learn from others. Just like a well trained dog will seem smart. It can't speak, but it can listen if someone teaches it. I would suggest that, even though they can't speak using words, dogs most certainly can communicate in details and specifics.

It is our failure, our inability to interpret what the dog is communicating that just makes us feel like we are better at communicating than dogs. The whole point of my piss story is that some animals communicate complex ideas through their pee, a form of communication that we have no ability to properly interpret. Dogs have no ability to interpret the detail and specifics in our words, but they do communicate detail and specifics through pee. There is no distinction in the communication process there, the distinction is that our brains have the ability to create abstractions using words and symbols, and dog brains do not have that ability.

Which is why shit gets so fucked up when people stop communicating and get tribal about shit. I don't disagree with you at all that there is a big difference in how humans and dogs communicate. My intention isn't to 'argue' with you or quibble over the semantics surrounding the relationship between consciousness and communication. I just want to point out here that when I saw the word "No," above I instinctively felt as though I was on the defensive. This defensive reaction to the word "no" is actually "why shit gets so fucked up" and people "get tribal about shit".

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

I just want to point out here that when I saw the word “No,” above I instinctively felt as though I was on the defensive. This defensive reaction to the word “no” is actually...

Something you need to work on as a person.

I'll just block you tho, that way you never have to see me type the big "no no word" again when I'm trying to help you understand something.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I have a more developed level of conciseness compared to [a particular dog].

Can you tell me what that looks like?

I don't especially believe that humans are maximally conscious, any more than we were any of the other pinnacles of biological development that we always thought we were. Our main super powers are that we sweat, run, and easily consume starch, and you don't really need more than that to explain us. If consciousness is indeed a gradient, I think it's just more hubris to assume we are the "most conscious".

But it's a really hard thing to discuss, let alone quantify. I'd love to know your kind of feeling of what more or less conscious looks like.

[–] CeffTheCeph@kbin.earth 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When my dog sniffs a pee stain out in the bush he instantly knows what species left it there, how long ago it was left there, whether there is a threat to him, whether whoever left it is in heat, a whole bunch of actual information useful for his survival. I can only smell stale piss.

My dog knows whether it was an other dog that peed, or a fox, or a wolf, or a lynx, or a marten, he knows there is a difference between them and knows how to react to those differences. He can map their geographical movements over time and establish patterns of his own movements that could give him the advantage in the event that their path crosses his at some point. But he isn't aware enough to know that that is what he is actually doing when he smells pee.

I can recognize and taxonomically label all of the potential piss perps, look through their geneological history and map out their ancestors over millions of years, and I can describe in detail the fur trade history in the region and how it impacted the European economy over the past 300 years. But no matter how hard I try, it still just smells like stale piss to me.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe the dog can do all that but we have no conscious means of understanding his communication style?