this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
46 points (97.9% liked)

askchapo

23315 readers
137 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
replaceable@hexbear.net
VILenin@hexbear.net
SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net
Wakmrow@hexbear.net
abc@hexbear.net
46
What happens after Xi Jinping? (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net
65 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The guys is ~~almost 80~~ 73, he's an old man.
He's been very successful in his tenure, carried out great anti-corruption campaigns, overseen a pivot to green energy, helmed China as it has retaken its place in the sun.
At the same time there's a lot of foreign policy stuff that leaves some wanting. There's still cliques of liberals (as far as I understand, which is very little, which is why I ask) that are working towards something very different (I hear Shanghai is really bad?) not to mention some impending economic doom, according to some China posters here.

Whatever the case is, Xi has been monumental and at the forefront of a great wave of change. One must Imagine he has planned for his retirement, moved things around to ensure some of His Guys are in good positions to take over.
Or maybe not?

So what happens when he goes away? Who is likely to take his spot? What will happen on the world stage?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Mostly, it is clear that the full liberalized economic model (ala Japan, South Korea, and Singapore) that was the model that the IMF supposedly based their financial progress against, is clearly flawed (in that it doesn't take into account the sheer amount of free money that was pumped into those economies to get them started, and that they are clearly slowing down, while China is continuing to accelerate).

The success of several different versions of Socialism with __ characteristics is extremely compelling.

[โ€“] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago

To be fair, the economy of Japan slowed down in large part due to the Plaza Accords handicapping economic development