Greentext

8315 readers

419 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

348

Anon does genealogy (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

91 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

Enough for what? Enough for it to take 1500 years for Christians to realize that beating people to death for insolence is wrong

No. I'm only referring to enslavement here.

Yeah I thought it was obvious I was referring to a subset of the behaviours of enslavers.

Exodus 20:13

You shall not murder.

The bible is pretty clear that it isn't murder to kill your own slave

You can misuse anything in the Bible to advocate for anything.

Doesn't that strike you as an argument against the utility of the bible as a moral guide? Don't you think it would be better if it was harder to use the bible to defend slave ownership? Like if it took a clearer stance against slavery. If instead of saying "treat your slaves justly and fairly" if it said "the truly righteous free their slaves and trust in the lord to provide, those that hold slaves will not inherit the kingdom of heaven" wouldn't that have hastened the end of slavery within Christendom?

"Impartial scholars" there is no such thing.

Sure, but there are ways that scholars can try to diminish their bias, and it isn't through legally binding faith commitments.