Not The Onion

21656 readers

2423 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

624

Christian man sues employer for forcing him to see a Pride flag on his way into work (www.lgbtqnation.com)

submitted 2 days ago by Infrapink@thebrainbin.org to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

279 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Department of Public Works employee Eric Batman claims that having to see a Progress Pride flag flying outside the department’s Alhambra, California, headquarters during the month of June effectively forces him to “celebrate, recognize, and solemnize conduct and actions that he views as sin” in conflict with his sincerely held Christian religious beliefs, according to a lawsuit filed in March by anti-LGBTQ+ evangelical nonprofit the Liberty Counsel.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Why should the law treat these things as the same though? If the law is blind to bigotry then that's a larger problem.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Why should the law treat these things as the same though?

Good question. I think that the law is going to see a flag on a government flagpole from a "does this represent part of the government or not?" standpoint. In that context, the message the flag sends is irrelevant. In this, and possibly many other cases, it represents a third party that is getting notoriety and support from a government facility. Maybe it's okay if its declared as an official act by someone that has the power to do so, but then it probably won't be a one-off like the flag in the article.

In truth I freaking love that people put a pride flag in such a prominent place. It represents values that align with basic human dignity and are harmless to everyone. I'm just concerned that it's going to open up a whole can of worms that might make things worse. Then again, things are already pretty bad so clever tactics that exploit loopholes are warranted.

If the law is blind to bigotry then that’s a larger problem.

The de-facto environment out there is increasingly so. It is indeed a massive fucking problem.