this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
56 points (92.4% liked)

electoralism

22263 readers
20 users here now

Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn't just about voting or running for office, but this community is.

Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Shitposting in other comms please!

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sexual abuseMs. Fifield also recalled that Mr. Platner’s displays of weaponry and discussions of violence sometimes left her uneasy.

She said he kept an AR-15 lying around his apartment on Capitol Hill, and would sharpen an ax — a relic from his time working on the Appalachian Trail before he enlisted in the Marines — while watching television.

He had what she described as a “warrior ethos” and would fantasize about killing people he deemed a threat, she said. She said he told her thatremoved was about power.

It was something that stuck with her through the years, Ms. Fifield said.

“He said this a lot: If anybody ever broke in here, I wouldremoved them,” she recalled, saying that he added that it would not be in “a sexual way, not in a gay way.”

“He was like, I wouldremoved them to show them that I’m dominant,” she said.

Asked about those remarks, a Platner campaign official did not dispute them. A friend who knew Mr. Platner and Ms. Fifield during that period said the comments sounded out of character.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh no, by all means I hope the utlra-zionist Susan Collins wins her senete seat and the cracker Platner dies in a house fire. I'm following the party line on this one stalin-approval

[–] Wisp@hexbear.net 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah that’s exactly what I meant. You are doing the classic lesser of 2 evils. And this probably doesn’t mean anything but I have nothing personally against you I was using you as an example about what the commenter said wasn’t true. But again that probably doesn’t mean anything since I definitely showed my stance

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

sicko-satan Yes I think ultra-zionists should lose their Senate seat, doesn't mean I would vote for the fucker tho

[–] Wisp@hexbear.net 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I did say you never actually advocated for voting for them if that’s what this is about Edit: I guess my wording was a little vague since I said I wasn’t sure

[–] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 9 points 3 days ago

It's just so not worth arguing over imo. I for one think having him win would be better if only to prove to libs that gaining x amount of senate seats still changes nothing and to prove that electoralism is a dead end.

It's definitely not worth all the people spitting venom at each other over.

[–] Pergoss@hexbear.net 1 points 3 days ago

Good. There is nothing wrong with saying that an ultra-zionist should lose their seat in theory, but advocating for people to actually vote for their only viable challenger is evil and unprincipled fedposting