this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
473 points (99.6% liked)
Privacy
48909 readers
1498 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm afraid you're mistaken here.
Outside of brake* checking or other reckless behavior by the lead driver, rear ending someone because you were looking away to check mirrors is generally strong evidence that you failed to maintain a safe following distance given the circumstances. A driver facing camera would support that conclusion rather than absolve you of responsibility.
In the case of someone driving erratically and causing a front end collision, your typical front-facing dashcam would be all you need to prove your innocence.
correct, because a front end can is a defensive measure you add to your car to protect you. an inward facing camera can not ever be for your benefit.
Ah, I thought you were saying you could use the inward camera for the inverse. I misread your initial comment, my apologies.