this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
586 points (98.7% liked)

Gaming

7762 readers
896 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think the point they're making is that you don't HAVE to make a 3D game, that's not required for art. If you can't make an artistic experience out of something without access to 3D, it's not the hardware that's limiting you, it's your artistic vision.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz -5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

If I can’t make my art how I want it it’s not my art

My point is that you can be limited in your art by the technology of your time

Imagine giving Bach a synthesiser, or a caveman clean white paper and colour pencils

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Imagine giving Bach a synthesiser

what's funny about this is that there are two existing ideas at play here that already came to pass.

We can listen to "Switched on Bach" which is what it sounds like when you play Bach songs through a synthesizer.

Also, there are lots of ways to manipulate the timbre of an organ, which is what Bach actually played. So he was already playing the synthesizer of his era.

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Your argument defeats itself. Was Bach's art not "his art" because he didn't have a synthesizer? He worked with the medium he preferred and used the tools available and made his art fit within them, he made people feel incredible things that are still relevant today despite not because of the instruments he was limited to, that's what an artist does.