this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
278 points (97.9% liked)
Not The Onion
21624 readers
1752 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I mean, a 12 year old is more likely than not to name a cylindrical boombox a 'bomb' and forget about it. Hopefully a sincere apology will suffice instead of a ban or criminal charges.
According to discussion about this elsewhere, there's a bluetooth speaker model named 'Bomb' that defaults to that name, whose website, humorously, has been rate limited due to I'm sure more traffic than they've ever had in its entire existence.
That's fucked up, and honestly negligent on the company's part. I hope they get sued.
Or we could stop pushing security theatre.
I don't know, I think airlines should have a responsibility to address potential bomb threats on their commercial flights but that might just be me...
Yes, terrorists are absolutely going around naming their WiFi and Bluetooth devices 'bomb'.
I think a simple rule of "Better safe than sorry" applies here. It is as if a robber comes with a plastic gun that looks like a real one. Nobody wants to figure out if it is real or not.
Best case, inconvenience. Worst case, death. Being stuck in a metal tube kilometres above the earth I’m going to lean towards caution.
This resembled the actual thing less than finger guns resemble the real ones.
I know that in modern times most toy guns look nothing like a real weapon (colorful, looking weird, and so on), but you can still find some guns like this one:
Finger guns
Not saying that's logical, but it's something the airlines have to act on. They have policies in place that they need to follow, and even if it's a finer comb than it needs to be it's better than having no policy at all.
People forget how many skyjackings there were in the 80s and 90s when they say airport security is worthless. Like "How many incidents have they prevented?" "Only all the ones that didn't happen..."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_theater
So is your suggestion to do away with airline security?
Not entirely. But it's undeniable that most security measures are rooted in nothing more than a desire for a bigger budget.
Honestly, I don't see any way this could result in criminal charges. It's a Bluetooth name, not someone actually threatening with a weapon. It's like walking around with a fake gun. You can't be charged with anything without actual intent to deceive people, and good luck proving that.
At most, this is a civil charge. The airline might try to get some money out of this person.
Poor chap. Chances are the person was flying economy. No way that person can give enough to recoup even the lawyer fees for the airline
Yep. They might still try it to punish them/set an example. They're not getting enough out of it to be worth it though, so odds are nothing happens.
I think it depends on the color of your skin.
Many kids with fake guns have been executed for this, because their skin is black
It could absolutely result in a criminal charge. If it results in a criminal conviction or not is another question.
But any prosecutor could make the argument that it's a terroristic threat.
It'd be a waste of time, but yeah.
You can still be prosecuted for things you didn't intend, the laws are usually less harsh. Manslaughter vs Murder for instance. I have no idea if a speaker whose name auto sets to bomb is illegal though. Seems dumb if it were
IIRC, all the laws about terrorism require intent.
Naming a Bluetooth device "bomb" could absolutely be intentionally disruptive or threatening.
Im not saying thats provable beyond reasonable doubt in this case.