this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
42 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

859 readers
567 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
42
SLOP. (hexbear.net)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by InevitableSwing@hexbear.net to c/slop@hexbear.net
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You made me curious so I googled. The results were shit. My wild hunch - based on no facts - is that AI creates images by sort of "layering" stuff and hoping for the best. In the image there's...

  • The court
  • The guys in the background
  • Trump & Hochul & the ball
  • The net

Everything is best guess. In other words AI uses the following "logic" and works from there.

  • Basketball courts are ~100 feet long.
  • People in the background will be smaller than in the foreground.
  • People are - I guess - about 5' 5" on average? Male basketball players are much taller of course.
  • The net is bigger than the ball.

Whatever is going on - there's a sort of - I don't know how to describe it - weird smoothing that beyond the mistakes creates a sort of generic perspective. I have a hunch that if you used a similar prompt but added - give it a raccoon's eye perspective from on the court - the results would be garbage because on the net there are no images of people playing basketball in a stadium from that POV and the AI wouldn't know what to do.

Rant. Can't there be a free search engine that's not garbage?

[โ€“] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago

There's another alternative that gives AI even less credit and how I think it probably really works.

The image is just an average of all the slam dunk on player images it has access to with faces and some details pasted over it.

Your method requires a lot more calculation based on understanding the composition of the photo, depths, courts, players etc...

Whereas making an average of all the shots it has learnt that are like that requires much less work than trying to design it completely by knowing about all the composite parts.

Which is what gives all the smoothing and not quite right feel for it.