this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
149 points (97.5% liked)
Technology
84875 readers
5267 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's a bad idea because shorting requires a settlement date.
You can't keep a short the same way that you keep an investment. You need to predict at what time it is worth less than it is now.
It's also a bad idea, because you can lose more than you invest. If you buy a stock, you can only lose the purchase price of that stock. If you short it, there's no upper limit to how much you can lose if the stock keeps rising. The people holding the stocks will do anything to keep inflating the stock price, even if it's evident to everyone that it is a bubble. As long as they can keep throwing money at it, they can keep the price going up.
This is a good reason not to short.
This is an even better reason not to short.
Thanks for the reply. This is the first time someone has explained stock options so simply to me.
Its the explanation of the old adeage "the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent"
beautiful words. I have never heard it before.