this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
105 points (97.3% liked)

World News

56199 readers
1849 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The World Health Organization’s chief said on Tuesday that he was “deeply concerned about the scale and speed” of an Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda that has resulted in a spike in deaths — to at least 130 — and more than 500 suspected cases. The outbreak is complicated by the rare strain of the disease, known as Bundibugyo, that standard field tests often miss and for which there are no vaccines or therapeutics.

Experts say Trump administration policies — like dismantling the U.S. Agency for International Development and withdrawing from WHO — have further undermined global health security and negatively impacted the response to the outbreak. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus warned of emerging cases in urban areas, including reports of cases in Uganda’s capital, Kampala, and Goma, a crossroads city in Congo that borders Rwanda.

The Intercept reported on the porous borders and worrying public health responses in Goma during an Ebola outbreak in 2019. At the time Anthony Fauci — then the head of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases — laid out the dangers of Ebola spreading in that urban center. “Since Goma is a city of millions of people, and since it has an international airport, it is a great concern,” he explained. “If Ebola could get into Goma and spread in Goma, that increases the likelihood that it could spread beyond the DRC into neighboring and distant countries.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

More blood on Trump's necrosis hands, and the hands of all his supporters, and the hands of every dipshit who sat out the 2024 election or voted for an entirely non-viable 3rd party.

[–] patruelis@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

It happens in another part of the world. No one cares unless it hits home.

He's a pedo? He didn't rape my kids, I don't care. This is the fking world and I hate it.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm not saying that the move is a good one, but I would point out that the US is about one-quarter of the world economy and about a thirtieth of the population. If the rest of the world wants to combat the start of a pandemic, it does have the resources to do so. The US might


as a wealthier country


have a larger responsibility to humanity as regards global health efforts, but it is not the only country with a responsibility. There are about two hundred countries in the world. If they want to stop a pandemic that might be starting, they can probably do so.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Counterarguments:

  • The USA pulled out just like that, 100 to 0. That's not how you do it after you sent support for who knows how long.
  • For the USA the amounts spent are tiny compared to ICE or military budgets.
  • The USA is NOT the only country sending aid. And while the previous argument applies to other countries as well, it might take time and effort to replace what the US abandoned.
[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 10 hours ago

The world is not fair - we need to move past that point.

The EU has some amount of resources, and could invest more into scientific advancement if it wanted to. China is, although that's a whole can of worms...

What can be done now, is the focus that will be needed moving forward.

[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

There are about two hundred countries in the world. If they want to stop a pandemic that might be starting, they can probably do so.

Obviously they will try. Ebola is a terrible disease.

However it's a lot harder to do in countries where running water is a luxury. Where hospitals might not even have clean sheets. And where you can't just lock a whole city down and pay for it with another trillion of national debt.

[–] Krusty@quokk.au 1 points 22 hours ago

get out the vote!

No! Don't vote for who you actually want. WTF is wrong with you?

Fun.