this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
150 points (97.5% liked)

me_irl

7707 readers
2592 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] starchylemming@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

the horni dwarf is coming for you

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Imagine it, you're just doing your job and this weirdo comes up and starts staring at you point blank? Id be afraid to get murdered

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's their job to be stared at, they agreed to do it. They're not in a back alley, they're in a brightly lit room full of people with lots of expensive cars that are probably all under camera surveillance. Those women are safe.

[–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Hey, fuck you buddy. Their job is to be stared at, yes, but not mad dogged by some blank faced dude 3 feet from their face. That's victim shaming, shame on you.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Victim blaming? There's no victim here. No crime has been committed. No one has been assaulted.

Take your shame game somewhere else, dude.

[–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"their job Is to be stared at, they agreed to do it, they're not in some back alley, these women are safe"

Get real. A barista is "safe" till a dude waits till she gets off and follows her to her car. This is a bad joke at best, stalking at worst.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Okay? Literally anyone could ambush anybody, that's no reason for the barista to accuse all her male customers of being potential attackers.

This dude is clearly just being a goober. If he had any intention of actually attacking these women he probably wouldn't be putting his face so close to them in front of cameras.

Assuming the worst is not an effective argumentation style.

Also, it's nowhere close to the definition of stalking. It's a single isolated incident, he doesn't follow them from one location to another, he's not targeting anyone in particular, he's literally just at a car show going from one model to the next taking awkward photos.

You're really diluting the meanings of words, and that does not help women who are victims of actual crimes. You should probably think a little more deeply about the consequences of your apparent need to manufacture outrage in order to signal your own ostensible virtue.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are scantily clad women hired to stand in front of cars at a car show, unfortunately being creeped at is their job. Though in this case I think the dude is doing it on purpose for the pictures.

[–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's no excuse to not have some dignity while you work

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

I totally agree with you. I’m just not sure how you can add dignity to the job of being eye candy at a car show.