this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
441 points (94.2% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

3211 readers
509 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Didn't the ACA get rid of insurers denying coverage based on "pre-existing conditions"?

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 4 hours ago

Yes but that was also a part of Romneycare, ie the heritage version implemented in MA under Romney being Governor

[–] SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Sure, but you're assuming that "coverage" leads to better outcomes. I remember diabetes being one of the big ones at the time and is avery maneagble disease.

So, what was the hospitalization rate before and after? Did it decrease as was promised? Is diabetes unique or does this trend hold for the majority of those "pre-existing conditions"?

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

now they just deny coverage with AI generated reasons and force you to nag and beg for them to pay what they're obligated to. much better!

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Hey, they were already doing that as their policy well before AI started helping them reject covering things their policy holders need

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 hours ago

Yeah I edited in the old method after I posted. Don't want them trying to blame this all on AI.