854
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] trailing9@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 year ago

Why do we accept that urban life is worse than rural life?

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 50 points 1 year ago

Cars ruin cities. There's more we can do to make cities better but that's the big one

[-] wombatula@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

I mean, do you think cars aren't a thing in rural areas or something? You think us country bumpkins are riding our horses around?

[-] phundrak@programming.dev 19 points 1 year ago

No, but it's much, much easier to get rid of them in cities where they can be replaced by subways, tramways, buses, bikes, and the like.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

All of which make for a way better quality of life than car hell. If people wern't sitting in unbearable traffic all day complaints about urban living would be far less common

[-] uis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Dunno. In rural areas I know there are more bikes than in city or cars in same area. Cause you know, cars are expensive.

[-] Texas_Hangover@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

What if you want to leave the city?

[-] Shalakushka@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

When you want to travel to the third world countries that connect the cities of the US you could rent a car, which is necessary because rural areas have apparently forgotten about public transit of any kind. In civilized countries, there's a solid network of mass transit basically everywhere. It doesn't matter that you're in a podunk town, a bus comes by every half hour because it's a necessity to have a regular bus more than a full one.

[-] BigNote@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Bullshit. There are vast areas of the western US and Alaska where this simply is not economically possible or even desirable. The same is true for huge parts of Canada and Australia and other countries that have very remote and thinly settled regions. Even when I lived in Ireland, which is tiny and relatively densely populated, there were rural communities that only had bus service once or twice a day.

[-] uis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

this simply is not economically possible or even desirable.

Life is not economically possible or desirable by capitalism.

[-] phundrak@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

Then you take the train. If this is not an available option, you take the car, one of which you either own but barely use when staying within the city, or that you buy (which is the option I chose, it's a lot cheaper than to own one).

There also should absolutely be trains that connect cities together too, it's already mostly the case in Europe which is around as big as the US, including high speed trains between major cities, but there is also a lot of regular trains that connect moderately sized towns with their nearby city. This can be both a cheaper and faster alternative to driving a car if you go somewhere you won't need a car (say, a city with very good public transit). China may be more comparable to the US as it is a single country with a similar size, but the size of their train network grew tremendously over the last twenty years, especially their high speed network. I guess a good start for the US would be to connect the major cities on the East Coast with high speed trains, such as DC, New York, Chicago, and other cities nearby, I can guarantee you there will be demand for that.

In fact, I'm about to take a high speed train from Paris to Lyon. Including the time I'll have spent in public transit to go to and come back from the train station, it'll take me three hours total vs four and a half hours by car without stops on traffic jams to travel some 400km (around 250 miles). The tickets cost me 90€ both ways, including the subway and tramway, while the same travel by car would cost me at least that much in not double.

[-] uis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

There's enough space out there it's not an issue. Cars are a rural technology we bulldozed half the city to makebroom for and then complained about not enough parking and too much traffic

Yeah, you didn't know? As soon as you leave a city all vehicles disappear.

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Rural areas don't have the same density of cars that a lot of urban areas do, so a lot of the problem of high density traffic just don't apply.
It's like saying that rural areas also have people, so it's not like urban areas have any unique people based problems.

My grocery store is on the intersection of two five lane roads that are busy all day every day. The crosswalks are about a 20 minute walk apart.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

A lot of things that people cite as benefits of small old towns are just benefits of not requiring massive amounts of parking and huge roads.

[-] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 year ago

Ignorance plain and simple. Most people nowadays live their whole lives in big urban centers, they have an idealistic view of country life and take the conveniences of city life for granted. City life can suck, I won't deny it, but living in bumfuck nowhere also has it's major drawbacks.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 8 points 1 year ago

Eh, I've lived both, now in the city, it's got its advantages but I'd be lying if I said I don't dream of going back from time to time.

[-] spauldo@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago

In some cases it is.

I live on an acre about 100 miles from the nearest sizable city. I've got a workshop, pecan trees, a pool, a smoker trailer, a bonfire pit fifteen feet across, and lots of peace and quiet. No HOA, no city ordinances, no traffic, and the only loud neighbor is a donkey that brays a few times a day.

That would cost me at least half a million in the city. The little apartment I used to rent Pre-COVID cost me nearly as much as the house payment I pay now.

Is it for everyone? No. There's no excitement, limited shopping and dining options, and anywhere I want to go is at least a twenty minute drive. But it's great for me. My job sends me all over the world so I get my fill of the city while living in hotels. Going home is a breath of fresh air.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 21 points 1 year ago

The key is to live in the countryside but not actually work in the countryside.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Having a decent income and wealth makes living on a rural location idyllic. Someone with a low income farming job and an acre in a rural location won't see the exact same house the same way because they will be struggling financially.

[-] spauldo@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Oh, for sure. I lived not too far from where I do now when I was younger and flipped burgers for a living. I had holes in the floor of my trailer where possums would come up at night and raid the cat food.

Still, being able to wake up, walk outside, and take my morning piss off the front porch while watching the sunrise was some compensation. Being out away from everyone is appealing to some people.

this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
854 points (95.7% liked)

> Greentext

7512 readers
7 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS