this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
551 points (96.5% liked)

Progressive Politics

4735 readers
383 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

why would I not agree with this?

I will never become a billionaire, so I have zero risk to support it.

1000003915

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I'd also support it if I thought it might affect me at some point. 5% isn't much and I'd still have well more than enough money for a lavish lifestyle.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I will never become a billionaire, so I have zero risk to support it.

You'll find it's okay to help our neighbours even when it costs us a little bit. In fact, that's often the case; and using that "I'll choose what can't possibly harm me" criteria could deny someone a lot just because it would cost you a little.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

but the billionaires will stop creating jobs, whatever will you do if unnecessary consumerism slows down /s

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

As a low IQ voter, I don't want this because when I'm a multi-billionaire I won't want to share my wealth.